How should we improve the NHS?
Give specific details of what could be done and how? Give examples of what is not working with proposed solutions. How could we leverage technology whilst also ensuring privacy?
Society Speaks turns noise into signal. We use machine learning to find where people actually agree, reveal bridge ideas that unite opposing groups, and surface genuine divisions worth addressing.
One carefully chosen question each day. Vote, share your reasoning, then see how others responded. Over time, this creates a longitudinal view of how public opinion evolves.
How it works:
We curate stories from trusted sources, filter out sensationalism, and turn them into balanced discussions. Real journalism as input to civic deliberation.
Stories from sources across the political spectrum.
AI scores articles for civic value, filtering out clickbait and sensationalism.
Each story generates seed statements representing multiple perspectives.
The Daily Brief delivers the news of the day you actually need to know about. 3-5 stories daily, each vetted for civic impact, analysed for partisan spin, and explained in plain language. See every angle, skip the outrage.
Delivered daily by email
Multi-source coverage with left/centre/right breakdown
"Why This Matters" context for every story
"Under the Radar" stories others miss
News Transparency Dashboard - 60+ sources organised by political leaning
Because we're mission-driven, not ad-funded:
Society Speaks is committed to keeping our core tools open, public, and free. Sign up to access the Daily Brief and News Dashboard at no cost.
Society Speaks
Wednesday, 8 January 2026
Parliament passes legislation requiring transparency in AI development...
💡 Why This Matters
Sets precedent for how democracies balance innovation with public safety
High civic impact, low media coverage
News, analysis, think tanks, and podcasts—curated for quality journalism
News/Analysis Podcast | Bias ratings from AllSides | See all 60+ sources
Throughout history, diverse voices have championed the power of dialogue and understanding.
"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; indeed, it's the only thing that ever has."
Cultural Anthropologist
"A critical, independent and investigative press is the lifeblood of any democracy."
South African President
"The peculiar evil of silencing the expression of an opinion is that it is robbing the human race."
Philosopher, 1859
Unlike polls that just count votes, our machine learning clusters participants by their voting patterns. This reveals bridge statements—ideas that resonate across opposing groups—and shows where genuine consensus exists.
Traditional media amplifies division. We're building democratic infrastructure for understanding.
Machine learning clusters participants by voting patterns to surface consensus, find bridge ideas, and reveal genuine divisions. Disagree agreeably.
Connect with decision-makers and contribute to discussions that shape policy.
Our platform is designed to reduce polarization and help find common ground.
Join the conversation in three simple steps
Start a discussion or browse discussions by topic, location, or join a featured conversation
Vote on statements and contribute your own views to the conversation
See where opinions align and understand different viewpoints
Advanced clustering algorithms identify consensus statements and bridge ideas that unite opposing groups
Have constructive debate, disagree agreeably and understand nuance
See how the conversation evolves as more people participate and then share it with decision makers
Explore our most impactful discussions
Give specific details of what could be done and how? Give examples of what is not working with proposed solutions. How could we leverage technology whilst also ensuring privacy?
A New Yorker food critic answers questions about burger toppings, beef tallow, and the subjectivity of memory
Joseph O'Neill explores the intricate relationship between storytelling and poetry, arguing that a well-crafted narrative should evoke the same emotional depth and resonance as a poem.
Here’s one big risk a public satirist of racism takes: by displaying tropes and crude imagery, he reveals just how well he knows and can deploy them himself
This article features a collection of reader questions and discussions, offering insights and commentary on various topics, encouraging engagement and thoughtful dialogue among readers.
The article critiques zero-sum economic thinking, arguing that it limits innovation and collaboration, ultimately hindering progress and equitable growth in society.