Skip to main content

Ben Horowitz and Balaji Srinivasan on Netscape and Network States

Politics
Global
Started January 29, 2026

Can a country be built from the internet up? Not as a metaphor or an online community, but as a system that replaces institutions we usually think of as fixed, money, law, and governance. In this conversation taken from The Network State Podcast, a16z cofounder Ben Horowitz joins Balaji Srinivasan to explore how internet native institutions are beginning to mirror and challenge traditional state structures. Drawing parallels to China’s early special economic zones, they discuss how constraine...

🗳️ Join the conversation
5 statements to vote on • Your perspective shapes the analysis
📊 Progress to Consensus Analysis Need: 7+ statements, 50+ votes
Statements 5/7
Total Votes 0/50
💡 Keep voting and adding statements to unlock consensus insights

You're voting anonymously

Your votes are stored locally in your browser. Create an account to have your votes included in consensus analysis.

CLAIM Posted by will Jan 29, 2026
Transitioning to internet-native institutions might create inequalities, as access to technology can disproportionately benefit the wealthy.
0 total votes
CLAIM Posted by will Jan 29, 2026
The concept of network states challenges our understanding of governance, but practical implementation may face significant obstacles.
0 total votes
CLAIM Posted by will Jan 29, 2026
Internet-based governance can foster innovation and economic growth, comparable to the success of China's special economic zones.
0 total votes
CLAIM Posted by will Jan 29, 2026
Relying on internet-native institutions risks undermining established legal frameworks and social contracts that protect citizens' rights.
0 total votes
CLAIM Posted by will Jan 29, 2026
Building a country from the internet up can lead to more flexible governance, responding faster to citizens' needs than traditional institutions.
0 total votes

💡 How This Works

  • Add Statements: Post claims or questions (10-500 characters)
  • Vote: Agree, Disagree, or Unsure on each statement
  • Respond: Add detailed pro/con responses with evidence
  • Consensus: After enough participation, analysis reveals opinion groups and areas of agreement