Skip to main content

Making Disagreement Useful Again

Democracy works better when we understand each other. Vote on the questions defining our era — then see where people genuinely agree, where they divide, and which ideas can bridge the gap and inform better decisions.

Browse freely without an account. Sign up free or sign in to save your Big Questions progress, votes, and personalised recap. · Trusted by individuals, organisations and governments globally

Discussion visualisation showing opinion clusters and consensus
140+ news sources curated 7,700+ discussions Global community No ads · No tracking Open source
Guided civic journey

What do you actually believe?

8 themes. At least 56 policy statements to start — more added as participants contribute. Vote on the issues that define our era, then see where humanity agrees, where it divides, and what might bridge the gap.

8
Big themes
56+
Statements
11
Editions

Not the right edition? Choose yours below.

Or choose an edition

  • Climate & planet
  • AI & technology
  • Economy & work
  • Health & care
  • War & security
  • Democracy
  • Society
  • Education
What voting reveals

We group people by how they vote, not who they are

Our machine learning finds patterns across thousands of votes — surfacing three kinds of insight you won't find anywhere else.

Consensus
Where society broadly agrees
"Access to reliable, unbiased news is essential for a functioning democracy."
Agreement across all groups 84%

This statement was agreed by participants across all political clusters.

Bridge Idea
Unites opposing groups
"Politicians of all parties have failed to honestly explain the trade-offs of their policies to voters."
Left cluster
76%
agree
Right cluster
79%
agree

Bridge ideas resonate strongly across groups that otherwise disagree — rare common ground.

Genuine Division
A real fault line worth addressing
"The state should guarantee a minimum income for every citizen, regardless of employment status."
62% agree 38% disagree

Genuine divisions show where deeper democratic deliberation is needed — not just counting votes.

Examples from real discussions on this platform. Your vote changes what society sees. Explore all discussions →

How it works

Three steps. Takes under five minutes to start.

1

Join a discussion or journey

Browse discussions on news topics, or take the Big Questions Journey — at least 56 statements across 8 themes, growing as participants contribute their own.

2

Vote on statements

Agree, Disagree, or Unsure on each statement. Add your reasoning if you want. Respectful by design — and anonymous if you prefer.

3

Discover insights — and share them

See consensus, bridge ideas and genuine divisions. Then share the results with the communities, organisations, or policymakers who need to hear them.

Three daily ways to engage

Vote on the day’s question. Read the day’s news. Pressure-test your own ideas in a five-minute game.

2 minutes a day

The Daily Question

One carefully chosen question every day. Vote, share your reasoning, then see how others responded. Over time, this creates a longitudinal view of how public opinion evolves.

Today's question

"Japan should expand access to quality palliative care and end-of-life support outside of hospital settings."

5 questions weekly by default · Adjust frequency anytime

The news you need. Zero noise.

The Daily Brief

3–5 stories daily, vetted for civic impact, analysed for partisan spin, and explained in plain language. Multi-source coverage with left/centre/right breakdown. No ads. No outrage.

Today's brief 27 Jun 2026
Lead Story 7 sources

Supreme Court Upholds Trump Immigration Policies

Why this matters

For migrants: many face increased risk of deportation. Globally: this shift may influence international migration patterns and refugee policies.

Policy & Governance 5 sources

UN Report Accuses Israel of War Crimes Against Children

Policy & Governance 1 sources

Andy Burnham Faces Immediate Challenges as PM

Economy & Business 6 sources

Trump Threatens 100% Tariffs on Europe Over Digital Tax

Society & Culture 2 sources

Next-Gen CRISPR Tools Spark Ethical Debate in Embryo Research

Read full brief

Free to read · 140+ sources across the spectrum →

5 minutes a day

Tradeoffs

You're in charge. A crisis lands on your desk — and every path forward costs something real. Cut spending and lose public trust. Borrow now and burden the next generation. Build fast and fracture communities. Five turns to govern. What kind of leader do you become?

Today's scenario Housing

The Housing Squeeze

Daily scenarios · Builds your streak · Links to real discussions

We draw from 140+ trusted sources across the spectrum

News, analysis, think tanks, and podcasts—curated for quality journalism

Left & Centre-Left
The Guardian The New Yorker The Atlantic The Intercept ProPublica New Statesman Slow Boring Brookings The News Agents
Centre
BBC News Financial Times The Economist Bloomberg Axios Lawfare MIT Tech Review Al Jazeera SCMP Semafor The Rest Is Politics Acquired
Centre-Right & Right
The Dispatch Reason The Spectator National Review The Free Press City Journal Cato Institute First Things All-In Podcast Triggernometry

News/Analysis Podcast Bias ratings from AllSides | See all 140+ sources

Voices that inspired this

"The peculiar evil of silencing the expression of an opinion is that it is robbing the human race — those who dissent from the opinion, still more than those who hold it."
Portrait of John Stuart Mill, philosopher and author of On Liberty
John Stuart Mill

Philosopher, On Liberty, 1859

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; indeed, it's the only thing that ever has."
Portrait of Margaret Mead, cultural anthropologist
Margaret Mead

Cultural Anthropologist

Join the conversation

Real discussions happening right now.

Healthcare Featured

How should we improve the NHS?

Give specific details of what could be done and how? Give examples of what is not working with proposed solutions. How could we leverage technology whilst also ensuring privacy?

United Kingdom
Politics

What might Kevin Kiley's independent campaign mean for California voters and the political landscape?

Rep. Kevin Kiley (R-Calif.) said Friday he is registering as "no party preference," rather than as a Republican, as he seeks reelection to Congress. Why it matters: The move comes after Kiley's Republican-leaning district was broken apart in mid-decade redistricting, forcing him to run in far more Democratic-leaning territory. Kiley's announcement sparked considerable confusion among his colleagues, with several lawmakers asking GOP leadership for clarity on whether he will continue to contribute to their slim House majority.One House Republican, asked if Kiley is staying in the GOP conference, told Axios: "I hope to God he is."A Kiley spokesperson told Axios it is "not official yet" whether he will leave the party or the conference now, adding: "For now, he's just filing as an independent for his reelection campaign." What they're saying: "Gerrymandering is a plague on democracy . but there's a way we can fight back and protect our democracy," Kiley said in a video posted to X. "By removing partisanship from the equation," he continued. "Today, I've just filed for reelection as 'no party preference.' This means I will not have a party affiliation on the ballot or as an officeholder."Kiley noted that most local government positions in California are decided in nonpartisan elections — though state and federal candidates can identify with a party. "It's no secret that I've been frustrated, at times disgusted, with the hyper-partisanship in Congress," he added. "In the last year it's led to the longest government shutdown in U.S. history, a massive increase in health care costs and, of course, a pointless redistricting war." Zoom in: Kiley is facing a large field of rivals in both parties to represent California's 6th District, including Democrats Richard Pan and Thien Ho. Kiley is easily the most well-funded candidate in the race, with nearly $2.1 million in fundraising receipts as of the end of 2025 compared to Ho's $380,000 and Pan's $320,000. Between the lines: Run

United States

Have a question society should answer?

Start a discussion and see where people actually stand — or run a structured programme for your community.

Fund the mission

Everything is free. It stays that way because of our subscribers.

A Personal Brief subscription funds our open source civic platform — and gives you a custom daily digest from your own sources in return.

Choose your own sources — RSS, Substack, PDFs

AI synthesis from multiple sources, on your schedule

Your subscription directly funds free civic participation for all

Start 30-Day Free Trial

From £4.99/month · No credit card required to trial

For organisations

Publisher, NGO, government, or researcher?

Society Speaks powers structured deliberation, citizen consultation, and civic journalism for organisations across the globe. Embed discussions, commission programmes, and connect your audience to what they actually believe.

See how it works