Skip to main content

News Discussions

Trending topics from trusted journalism, transformed into structured debates. Unlike our community discussions, these are automatically curated from breaking news to spark timely, nuanced conversation.

How is this different from Explore?

News Discussions are automatically generated from trending stories in real-time. Explore Discussions shows community-created topics on any subject. Both use the same structured debate format, but News focuses on current affairs.

Our News Sources (155 trusted outlets)

We aggregate stories from these reputable sources to ensure balanced, quality coverage:

Acquired Podcast Africa Confidential Al Jazeera English Al Monitor All-In Podcast AllAfrica Americas Quarterly Andrew Sullivan Anne Applebaum Ars Technica Associated Press Axios BBC News BBC Sport BBC World Service Bloomberg Brookings Institution CSIS Caixin Global Carbon Brief Carnegie Endowment Cato Institute Channel NewsAsia Chartbook Chatham House Christianity Today City Journal Clean Energy Wire CoinDesk Columbia Journalism Review Commentary Magazine Commonweal Cory Doctorow Daily Maverick Daily Wire Decrypt Deutsche Welle Diary of a CEO E&E News ESPN El País América El País English Euractiv Eurostat Ezra Klein Farnam Street Financial Times First Things Foreign Affairs Foreign Policy France24 Francis Fukuyama Freddie deBoer Haaretz Hot Air Huberman Lab IEA IMF Ian Bremmer Institute for Fiscal Studies Institute for Government International Crisis Group Jonathan Rauch Law & Liberty Le Monde English Lex Fridman Podcast MIT Technology Review Mail & Guardian Manhattan Institute Marginal Revolution Matt Taibbi Modern Wisdom National Review Nature News New Statesman Nieman Lab Nikkei Asia Noahpinion Not Boring OECD Office for Budget Responsibility Office for National Statistics Our World in Data Paul Graham Pew Research Center Platformer Politico Politico EU Power Line Poynter ProPublica RAND Corporation RealClearPolitics Reason Resolution Foundation Rest of World STAT News Science Magazine Semafor Simon Willison Sixth Tone Sky Sports Slow Boring South China Morning Post Spiegel International Straits Times Stratechery Tablet Magazine TechCrunch The American Conservative The Athletic The Atlantic The Block The Commentary Magazine The Conversation The Critic The Dispatch The Economist The Ezra Klein Show The Federalist The Free Press The Guardian The Independent The Intercept The Lancet The National The New York Times The New Yorker The News Agents The Observer The Pragmatic Engineer The Rest Is Politics The Slow Newscast The Spectator US The Telegraph The Tim Ferriss Show The Times The Verge Time Tortoise Media Triggernometry UK Parliament UN News US Census Bureau UnHerd Vox WHO Wall Street Journal War on the Rocks Washington Examiner Wired World Bank World Economic Forum Yascha Mounk Zeynep Tufekci
Latest By Topic Healthcare Environment Education Technology Economy Politics Society Infrastructure Geopolitics Business Culture
Geopolitics

What are the potential policy implications of advancing mechanized warfare for future conflicts and military strategy?

Mechanized warfare is not dead. Observers have been debating this topic since the Ukrainian military and volunteers beat back the Russian assault on Kiev in 2022. The professional discourse that has ensued often devolves into disputes about specific technologies or weapon systems and their perceived value on the future battlefield. Everyone is missing the big picture.Frontlines in Ukraine today present eerie similarities to World War I but with advanced technologies inhibiting mechanized attacks. In rare cases, these same technologies have created windows of opportunity to make mechanized attacks possible. Larger windows create decisive breakthroughs, and smaller windows create suicidal bottlenecks.We The post Why Mechanized Warfare Will Still Be Decisive in the Next Land War appeared first on War on the Rocks

Global
Join Discussion
Society

How can we work together to address the growing hunger crisis affecting many countries?

By Crispian Balmer ROME, April 24 (Reuters) - Conflict, drought and shrinking aid will keep global hunger at critical levels in 2026, with food insecurity expected to worsen in some of the world's most fragile countries, according to the 2026 Global Report on Food Crises. The 10th edition of the hunger monitor, published by a coalition of development and humanitarian organisations, said that acute hunger had doubled over the past decade with two famines declared last year for the first time in the report's history - in Gaza and Sudan

Global
Join Discussion