Skip to main content

#473 – Iran War Debate: Nuclear Weapons, Trump, Peace, Power & the Middle East

Geopolitics
Global
Started February 09, 2026

Debate on Iran war between Scott Horton and Mark Dubowitz. Scott Horton is the author and director of the Libertarian Institute, editorial director of Antiwar.com, host of The Scott Horton Show, and for the past three decades, a staunch critic of U.S. foreign policy and military interventionism. Mark Dubowitz is the chief executive of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, host of the Iran Breakdown podcast, and a leading expert on Iran and its nuclear program for over 20 years. This deba...

🗳️ Join the conversation
5 statements to vote on • Your perspective shapes the analysis
📊 Progress to Consensus Analysis Need: 7+ statements, 50+ votes
Statements 5/7
Total Votes 0/50
💡 Keep voting and adding statements to unlock consensus insights

Your votes count

No account needed — your votes are saved and included in the consensus analysis. Create an account to track your voting history and add statements.

CLAIM Posted by will Feb 09, 2026
A robust defense against Iran's nuclear ambitions is essential for the safety of U.S. allies and maintaining power dynamics in the Middle East.
0 total votes
CLAIM Posted by will Feb 09, 2026
History shows that military interventions often exacerbate conflicts rather than resolve them, as seen in the Middle East.
0 total votes
CLAIM Posted by will Feb 09, 2026
Engaging in military intervention in Iran is necessary to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons and protect global security.
0 total votes
CLAIM Posted by will Feb 09, 2026
The debate over Iran's nuclear capabilities highlights the complex balance between national security and ethical foreign policy.
0 total votes
CLAIM Posted by will Feb 09, 2026
The U.S. should prioritize diplomatic engagement over military action in Iran to foster long-term peace and stability in the region.
0 total votes

💡 How This Works

  • Add Statements: Post claims or questions (10-500 characters)
  • Vote: Agree, Disagree, or Unsure on each statement
  • Respond: Add detailed pro/con responses with evidence
  • Consensus: After enough participation, analysis reveals opinion groups and areas of agreement