How Foundation Models Evolved: A PhD Journey Through AI's Breakthrough Era

Technology
United States
Started January 17, 2026

The Stanford PhD who built DSPy thought he was just creating better prompts—until he realized he'd accidentally invented a new paradigm that makes LLMs actually programmable. While everyone obsesses over whether LLMs will get us to AGI, Omar Khattab is solving a more urgent problem: the gap between what you want AI to do and your ability to tell it, the absence of a real programming language for intent. He argues the entire field has been approaching this backwards, treating natural language ...

🗳️ Be one of the first to share your view
5 statements to vote on • Your perspective matters
📊 Progress to Consensus Analysis Need: 7+ statements, 50+ votes
Statements 5/7
Total Votes 0/50
💡 Keep voting and adding statements to unlock consensus insights

You're voting anonymously

Your votes are stored locally in your browser. Create an account to have your votes included in consensus analysis.

CLAIM Posted by will Jan 17, 2026
The evolution of foundation models like DSPy highlights the necessity for better user-AI communication, which is crucial for future AI applications.
0 total votes
CLAIM Posted by will Jan 17, 2026
Khattab's approach risks oversimplifying the complexities of human intent, which could lead to misinterpretations in AI's decision-making.
0 total votes
CLAIM Posted by will Jan 17, 2026
The programming of LLMs through models like DSPy represents a significant shift that could redefine user interaction with AI technology.
0 total votes
CLAIM Posted by will Jan 17, 2026
Omar Khattab's development of DSPy is a groundbreaking step towards making AI more accessible and programmable for everyday users.
0 total votes
CLAIM Posted by will Jan 17, 2026
Focusing on creating a programming language for AI intent may distract from the broader ethical concerns surrounding LLMs and AGI development.
0 total votes

💡 How This Works

  • Add Statements: Post claims or questions (10-500 characters)
  • Vote: Agree, Disagree, or Unsure on each statement
  • Respond: Add detailed pro/con responses with evidence
  • Consensus: After enough participation, analysis reveals opinion groups and areas of agreement