翻訳中 — お使いの言語版を準備している間、このコンテンツは英語で表示されています。

ディスカッションに戻る

ディスカッションを保存

サインインして保存して更新を取得してください。

The Accidental Architect of the Internet’s Brain

Technology

グローバル

July 31, 2026に開始

Steven Pruitt, who is widely regarded as the most prolific Wikipedia editor, has made more than six million edits to the site, and, by extension, has quietly shaped the raw material that every major A.I. chatbot was trained on

ソース記事

The Accidental Architect of the Internet’s Brain

The New Yorker (United States) | Jul 30, 2026

主張を追加分析 0/5

並び替え：

Need to find a specific claim? Search all statements.

🗳️ Join the conversation

10 投票すべき主張 • Your perspective shapes the analysis

📊 Progress to Consensus Analysis Need: 7+ participants, 20+ votes, 3+ votes per statement

Participants 0/7

Statements (10+ recommended) 10/10

Total Votes 0/20

💡 Progress updates live here. Final readiness is confirmed when all three requirements are met.

Your votes count

No account needed — your votes are saved and included in the consensus analysis. Create an account to track your voting history and add statements.

CLAIM 投稿者： admin • Jul 31, 2026

The role of contributors like Steven Pruitt in shaping online knowledge should be recognized and celebrated.

翻訳準備中

💬 ディスカッションを見る

Be first to respond

Vote to see results

CLAIM 投稿者： admin • Jul 31, 2026

AI companies should be required to acknowledge and financially compensate the open-source communities and volunteer editors whose work trained their models.

翻訳準備中

💬 ディスカッションを見る

Be first to respond

Vote to see results

CLAIM 投稿者： admin • Jul 31, 2026

Artificial intelligence should be trained on a broader range of sources beyond Wikipedia to ensure accuracy.

翻訳準備中

💬 ディスカッションを見る

Be first to respond

Vote to see results

CLAIM 投稿者： admin • Jul 31, 2026

Whether or not compensation happens, AI companies must disclose publicly which human-created datasets trained their systems and in what proportion.

翻訳準備中

💬 ディスカッションを見る

Be first to respond

Vote to see results

CLAIM 投稿者： admin • Jul 31, 2026

Granting Wikipedia editors collective veto power over AI training would give unelected volunteers control over technology that affects billions.

翻訳準備中

💬 ディスカッションを見る

Be first to respond

Vote to see results

CLAIM 投稿者： admin • Jul 31, 2026

Open-source contributors and volunteer editors deserve protections ensuring their work cannot be privatised or monopolised without their consent.

翻訳準備中

💬 ディスカッションを見る

Be first to respond

Vote to see results

CLAIM 投稿者： admin • Jul 31, 2026

Wikipedia's governance should evolve to give active editors formal voice in decisions about how their work is used by commercial AI systems.

翻訳準備中

💬 ディスカッションを見る

Be first to respond

Vote to see results

CLAIM 投稿者： admin • Jul 31, 2026

The reliance on Wikipedia content for AI training highlights the need for better editorial oversight.

翻訳準備中

💬 ディスカッションを見る

Be first to respond

Vote to see results

CLAIM 投稿者： admin • Jul 31, 2026

Restricting how companies can use freely available data would slow innovation and reduce the practical utility of open knowledge systems.

翻訳準備中

💬 ディスカッションを見る

Be first to respond

Vote to see results

CLAIM 投稿者： admin • Jul 31, 2026

Wikipedia editors should strive for neutrality to avoid shaping biased AI systems.

翻訳準備中

💬 ディスカッションを見る

Be first to respond

Vote to see results

💡 How This Works

• Add Statements: Post claims or questions (10-500 characters)
• Vote: Agree, Disagree, or Unsure on each statement
• Respond: Add detailed pro/con responses with evidence
• Consensus: After enough participation, analysis reveals opinion groups and areas of agreement

Society Speaks is open and independent. Your support keeps civic discussion free from advertising and commercial influence.