A Better Greenland Deal
LinkedIn
Meta (Facebook)
X (Twitter)
BlueSky
WhatsApp
Telegram
Geopolitics
United States
Started January 29, 2026
How to turn Trump's tantrum into a win for everyone
Source Articles
A Better Greenland Deal
Foreign Affairs (United States) | Jan 28, 2026
🗳️ Join the conversation
5 statements to vote on •
Your perspective shapes the analysis
📊 Progress to Consensus Analysis
Need: 7+ statements, 50+ votes
Statements
5/7
Total Votes
0/50
💡 Keep voting and adding statements to unlock consensus insights
You're voting anonymously
Your votes are stored locally in your browser. Create an account to have your votes included in consensus analysis.
CLAIM
Posted by will
•
Jan 29, 2026
Investing in Greenland's infrastructure and economy is a pragmatic solution to geopolitical competition in the Arctic.
0
total votes
CLAIM
Posted by will
•
Jan 29, 2026
Expanding trade with Greenland could boost economic growth and foster stronger U.S.-Greenland relations.
0
total votes
CLAIM
Posted by will
•
Jan 29, 2026
Acquiring Greenland undermines its sovereignty and sets a dangerous precedent for U.S. foreign policy.
0
total votes
CLAIM
Posted by will
•
Jan 29, 2026
The focus should be on addressing climate change impacts in Greenland rather than pursuing exploitative deals.
0
total votes
CLAIM
Posted by will
•
Jan 29, 2026
A collaborative approach to Greenland's resources could benefit both Greenland and the U.S. without territorial claims.
0
total votes
💡 How This Works
- • Add Statements: Post claims or questions (10-500 characters)
- • Vote: Agree, Disagree, or Unsure on each statement
- • Respond: Add detailed pro/con responses with evidence
- • Consensus: After enough participation, analysis reveals opinion groups and areas of agreement