Aller au contenu principal
Traduction en cours — ce contenu s’affiche en anglais pendant que votre version dans votre langue est en préparation.

We’re Not Losing Control of A.I. We’re Giving It Away.

Technology
United States
Commencé September 20, 2026

Fears of out-of-control A.I. have reached a boil over the last few weeks, and several industry executives have called for a coordinated slowdown of A.I. development. But if our goal is to control A.I. — and that should be our goal — slowing down isn’t enough. We need to stop the labs from doing something they’re already on the cusp of doing: recursive self-improvement, or handing over the training of A.I. models to A.I

Need to find a specific claim? Search all statements.
🗳️ Join the conversation
10 affirmations à voter • Your perspective shapes the analysis
📊 Progress to Consensus Analysis Need: 7+ participants, 20+ votes, 3+ votes per statement
Participants 0/7
Statements (10+ recommended) 10/10
Total Votes 0/20
💡 Progress updates live here. Final readiness is confirmed when all three requirements are met.

Your votes count

No account needed — your votes are saved and included in the consensus analysis. Create an account to track your voting history and add statements.

CLAIM Publié par admin Sep 20, 2026
Blanket restrictions on AI research will cause the United States to lose technological leadership to China and other adversaries.

Traduction en attente

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM Publié par admin Sep 20, 2026
A.I. should be developed transparently, with public input guiding its ethical implications.

Traduction en attente

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM Publié par admin Sep 20, 2026
If A.I. systems become capable of self-improvement, we must establish strict limits on their autonomy.

Traduction en attente

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM Publié par admin Sep 20, 2026
Fear of AI self-improvement is speculative and should not drive policy that constrains beneficial applications already helping medicine and science.

Traduction en attente

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM Publié par admin Sep 20, 2026
Regulatory overreach in response to AI fears will stifle open-source AI development and push all innovation into secretive corporate labs.

Traduction en attente

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM Publié par admin Sep 20, 2026
AI safety research and capability research must be funded and pursued in parallel, not treated as opposing goals.

Traduction en attente

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM Publié par admin Sep 20, 2026
A.I. should not be handed over to autonomous systems for training without strict ethical guidelines.

Traduction en attente

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM Publié par admin Sep 20, 2026
A.I. development should continue at a measured pace to balance innovation and safety.

Traduction en attente

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM Publié par admin Sep 20, 2026
Recursive self-improvement in AI systems would make human oversight impossible and therefore must be prevented by law before it occurs.

Traduction en attente

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM Publié par admin Sep 20, 2026
Independent auditing and testing of AI systems should be mandatory before commercial deployment, regardless of development speed.

Traduction en attente

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results

💡 How This Works

  • Add Statements: Post claims or questions (10-500 characters)
  • Vote: Agree, Disagree, or Unsure on each statement
  • Respond: Add detailed pro/con responses with evidence
  • Consensus: After enough participation, analysis reveals opinion groups and areas of agreement

Society Speaks is open and independent. Your support keeps civic discussion free from advertising and commercial influence.

Support us