NYT To SCOTUS: "I just want them to know we're watching them."
LinkedIn
Meta (Facebook)
X (Twitter)
BlueSky
WhatsApp
Telegram
Politics
United States
Started February 03, 2026
We learn fascinating insights about how the newspaper of record covers the "holy of holies of American law."
Source Articles
NYT To SCOTUS: "I just want them to know we're watching them."
Reason (United States) | Feb 03, 2026
🗳️ Join the conversation
5 statements to vote on •
Your perspective shapes the analysis
📊 Progress to Consensus Analysis
Need: 7+ statements, 50+ votes
Statements
5/7
Total Votes
0/50
💡 Keep voting and adding statements to unlock consensus insights
You're voting anonymously
Your votes are stored locally in your browser. Create an account to have your votes included in consensus analysis.
CLAIM
Posted by will
•
Feb 03, 2026
The focus on 'watching' SCOTUS may undermine its independence, as public pressure could influence justices' decisions and rulings.
0
total votes
CLAIM
Posted by will
•
Feb 03, 2026
The NYT's coverage may distort public perception of the Supreme Court, prioritizing sensationalism over nuanced legal analysis.
0
total votes
CLAIM
Posted by will
•
Feb 03, 2026
Media coverage of the Supreme Court should be approached critically, recognizing both its potential benefits and limitations in shaping public opinion.
0
total votes
CLAIM
Posted by will
•
Feb 03, 2026
The NYT's scrutiny of SCOTUS ensures transparency and accountability in the judiciary, which is essential for a functioning democracy.
0
total votes
CLAIM
Posted by will
•
Feb 03, 2026
A vigilant press like the NYT is crucial for keeping the judiciary in check, fostering a culture of responsibility among justices.
0
total votes
💡 How This Works
- • Add Statements: Post claims or questions (10-500 characters)
- • Vote: Agree, Disagree, or Unsure on each statement
- • Respond: Add detailed pro/con responses with evidence
- • Consensus: After enough participation, analysis reveals opinion groups and areas of agreement