What We Learned From Jodi Kantor's Latest Expose About The SCOTUS NDA
LinkedIn
Meta (Facebook)
X (Twitter)
BlueSky
WhatsApp
Telegram
Politics
United States
Started February 04, 2026
The Chief is now requiring all employees (but likely not the Justices) to sign Non-Disclosure Agreements, which do not seem to be working
Source Articles
What We Learned From Jodi Kantor's Latest Expose About The SCOTUS NDA
Reason (United States) | Feb 03, 2026
🗳️ Join the conversation
5 statements to vote on •
Your perspective shapes the analysis
📊 Progress to Consensus Analysis
Need: 7+ statements, 50+ votes
Statements
5/7
Total Votes
0/50
💡 Keep voting and adding statements to unlock consensus insights
You're voting anonymously
Your votes are stored locally in your browser. Create an account to have your votes included in consensus analysis.
CLAIM
Posted by will
•
Feb 04, 2026
The effectiveness of NDAs in the SCOTUS context raises questions about their necessity and impact on workplace culture.
0
total votes
CLAIM
Posted by will
•
Feb 04, 2026
Requiring NDAs for SCOTUS employees is essential to protect sensitive information and maintain the integrity of the judicial process.
0
total votes
CLAIM
Posted by will
•
Feb 04, 2026
NDAs undermine transparency and public trust in the judicial system, especially when they are applied to employees but not Justices.
0
total votes
CLAIM
Posted by will
•
Feb 04, 2026
Implementing NDAs may be a necessary step to safeguard the Supreme Court's deliberative process from external pressures.
0
total votes
CLAIM
Posted by will
•
Feb 04, 2026
The Chief Justice's NDA policy reflects a troubling trend towards secrecy in government institutions, which could harm democratic accountability.
0
total votes
💡 How This Works
- • Add Statements: Post claims or questions (10-500 characters)
- • Vote: Agree, Disagree, or Unsure on each statement
- • Respond: Add detailed pro/con responses with evidence
- • Consensus: After enough participation, analysis reveals opinion groups and areas of agreement