Must and May
LinkedIn
Meta (Facebook)
X (Twitter)
BlueSky
WhatsApp
Telegram
Politics
Global
Started January 15, 2026
Plus: Defending ‘We do not have a definition for the court.’
Source Articles
Must and May
The Dispatch (United States) | Jan 15, 2026
🗳️ Be one of the first to share your view
5 statements to vote on • Your perspective matters
📊 Progress to Consensus Analysis
Need: 7+ statements, 50+ votes
Statements
5/7
Total Votes
0/50
💡 Keep voting and adding statements to unlock consensus insights
You're voting anonymously
Your votes are stored locally in your browser. Create an account to have your votes included in consensus analysis.
CLAIM
Posted by will
•
Jan 15, 2026
The lack of a definition for the court invites ambiguity, which can lead to inconsistent rulings and public mistrust.
0 total votes
CLAIM
Posted by will
•
Jan 15, 2026
Establishing a clear definition for the court could enhance public understanding and engagement with the judicial process.
0 total votes
CLAIM
Posted by will
•
Jan 15, 2026
Implementing a rigid definition of the court could undermine the judiciary's ability to evolve with societal changes.
0 total votes
CLAIM
Posted by will
•
Jan 15, 2026
Defining the court limits its flexibility and adaptability, which are crucial for addressing complex modern legal challenges.
0 total votes
CLAIM
Posted by will
•
Jan 15, 2026
A clear definition of the court is essential for upholding justice and ensuring accountability in our legal system.
0 total votes
💡 How This Works
- • Add Statements: Post claims or questions (10-500 characters)
- • Vote: Agree, Disagree, or Unsure on each statement
- • Respond: Add detailed pro/con responses with evidence
- • Consensus: After enough participation, analysis reveals opinion groups and areas of agreement