Skip to main content
Traduction en cours — ce contenu s’affiche en anglais pendant que votre version dans votre langue est en préparation.
Retour aux discussions

Mon témoignage devant le sous-comité de la Chambre judiciaire contre la « Loi pour préserver une Amérique sans Charia »

Politics
United States
Commencé February 10, 2026

I will be testifying against this proposed legislation - which would authorize exclusion or deportation of all or most non-citizen Muslim immigrants

Articles sources

Ajouter une affirmation Analyse 0/5
Need to find a specific claim? Search all statements.
🗳️ Join the conversation
5 affirmations à voter • Your perspective shapes the analysis
📊 Progress to Consensus Analysis Need: 7+ participants, 20+ votes, 3+ votes per statement
Participants 0/7
Statements (7+ recommended) 5/7
Total Votes 0/20
💡 Progress updates live here. Final readiness is confirmed when all three requirements are met.

Your votes count

No account needed — your votes are saved and included in the consensus analysis. Create an account to track your voting history and add statements.

CLAIM Publié par will • Feb 10, 2026
The 'Preserving a Sharia-Free America Act' is essential for national security, ensuring that extremist ideologies do not infiltrate our communities.

Traduction en attente

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 Voir la discussion
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM Publié par will • Feb 10, 2026
Excluding non-citizen Muslim immigrants undermines American values of freedom and inclusion, fostering discrimination rather than unity.

Traduction en attente

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 Voir la discussion
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM Publié par will • Feb 10, 2026
While national security is a priority, we must carefully balance it with civil liberties to avoid creating a slippery slope of discrimination.

Traduction en attente

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 Voir la discussion
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM Publié par will • Feb 10, 2026
Legislation should focus on individual actions rather than broad exclusions based on religion, as collective punishment is unjust.

Traduction en attente

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 Voir la discussion
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM Publié par will • Feb 10, 2026
This proposed act risks alienating a significant portion of our population, ultimately harming social cohesion and trust in government.

Traduction en attente

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 Voir la discussion
Be first to respond
Vote to see results

💡 How This Works

  • • Add Statements: Post claims or questions (10-500 characters)
  • • Vote: Agree, Disagree, or Unsure on each statement
  • • Respond: Add detailed pro/con responses with evidence
  • • Consensus: After enough participation, analysis reveals opinion groups and areas of agreement

Society Speaks is open and independent. Your support keeps civic discussion free from advertising and commercial influence.

Support us