Skip to main content

The Greatest Tension Within 21st Century Progressivism Remains Unresolved

Politics
United States
Started February 12, 2026

you can't be both a carceral feminist movement and an anti-police state movement

🗳️ Join the conversation
5 statements to vote on • Your perspective shapes the analysis
📊 Progress to Consensus Analysis Need: 7+ statements, 50+ votes
Statements 5/7
Total Votes 0/50
💡 Keep voting and adding statements to unlock consensus insights

Your votes count

No account needed — your votes are saved and included in the consensus analysis. Create an account to track your voting history and add statements.

CLAIM Posted by will Feb 12, 2026
The tension between carceral feminism and anti-police movements highlights the need for a more nuanced approach to justice and safety.
0 total votes
CLAIM Posted by will Feb 12, 2026
An anti-police state perspective undermines the necessity of law enforcement in safeguarding vulnerable communities, including women.
0 total votes
CLAIM Posted by will Feb 12, 2026
Carceral feminism is essential for protecting women's rights in a society that often fails to address gender-based violence.
0 total votes
CLAIM Posted by will Feb 12, 2026
A unified feminist movement must reconcile the need for safety with the critique of punitive systems to be truly effective in the 21st century.
0 total votes
CLAIM Posted by will Feb 12, 2026
Promoting a carceral feminist agenda can lead to increased criminalization of marginalized groups, which contradicts anti-police state goals.
0 total votes

💡 How This Works

  • Add Statements: Post claims or questions (10-500 characters)
  • Vote: Agree, Disagree, or Unsure on each statement
  • Respond: Add detailed pro/con responses with evidence
  • Consensus: After enough participation, analysis reveals opinion groups and areas of agreement