Skip to main content
번역 진행 중 — 귀하의 언어 버전을 준비하는 동안 이 콘텐츠가 영어로 표시됩니다.

EXCLUSIVE: FBI Gathered Intel On 1,000 Journalists, Politicians, Religious Organizations On Flimsy Grounds

Politics
United States
February 13, 2026에 시작됨

'The FBI can gather a dossier on anyone they choose'

Need to find a specific claim? Search all statements.
🗳️ Join the conversation
5 투표할 진술 • Your perspective shapes the analysis
📊 Progress to Consensus Analysis Need: 7+ participants, 20+ votes, 3+ votes per statement
Participants 0/7
Statements (7+ recommended) 5/7
Total Votes 0/20
💡 Progress updates live here. Final readiness is confirmed when all three requirements are met.

Your votes count

No account needed — your votes are saved and included in the consensus analysis. Create an account to track your voting history and add statements.

CLAIM 게시자: will Feb 13, 2026
The FBI's ability to gather intel on journalists undermines press freedom and stifles critical voices in democracy.

번역 대기 중

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM 게시자: will Feb 13, 2026
The accountability of the FBI in its surveillance practices is crucial for maintaining public trust in law enforcement.

번역 대기 중

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM 게시자: will Feb 13, 2026
The FBI's actions raise serious ethical questions about privacy and the balance between security and civil liberties.

번역 대기 중

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM 게시자: will Feb 13, 2026
Flimsy grounds for intelligence gathering can lead to a slippery slope of unwarranted surveillance and abuse of power.

번역 대기 중

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM 게시자: will Feb 13, 2026
Monitoring public figures, including journalists, is essential for national security and preventing threats to society.

번역 대기 중

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results

💡 How This Works

  • Add Statements: Post claims or questions (10-500 characters)
  • Vote: Agree, Disagree, or Unsure on each statement
  • Respond: Add detailed pro/con responses with evidence
  • Consensus: After enough participation, analysis reveals opinion groups and areas of agreement

Society Speaks is open and independent. Your support keeps civic discussion free from advertising and commercial influence.

Support us