Consensus Analysis
Climate Action: Finding Common Ground
Opinion Groups Visualization
How to read this chart:
- Each dot represents a participant
- Colors show different opinion groups
- Closer dots = more similar voting patterns
- Hover over dots to see participant details
What Each Group Believes
These are the statements each opinion group agrees on most strongly. This helps understand the core beliefs that define each group.
Group 1
5 participantsTop beliefs:
-
We need practical solutions, not just rhetoric100% agree 5 votes in group
-
Economic growth and environmental protection can coexist80% agree 5 votes in group
-
Electric vehicles should receive government subsidies75% agree 4 votes in group
-
Climate education should be mandatory in schools75% agree 4 votes in group
-
Wealthy nations should pay more for climate action75% agree 4 votes in group
Group 3
7 participantsTop beliefs:
-
Economic growth and environmental protection can coexist100% agree 7 votes in group
-
We need practical solutions, not just rhetoric100% agree 7 votes in group
-
We should prioritize economic growth over environmental regulations100% agree 7 votes in group
-
Technology alone cannot solve the climate crisis100% agree 7 votes in group
-
Climate change is a real and urgent problem0% agree 7 votes in group
Group 5
7 participantsTop beliefs:
-
Climate change is a real and urgent problem100% agree 7 votes in group
-
We need to invest more in renewable energy100% agree 6 votes in group
-
Protecting the environment benefits everyone100% agree 6 votes in group
-
Economic growth and environmental protection can coexist100% agree 6 votes in group
-
Local communities should have a say in environmental policies100% agree 6 votes in group
🟢 Areas of Consensus (1)
These statements have broad agreement across all opinion groups.
🟡 Bridge Statements (4)
These statements unite different opinion groups and offer common ground.
🔴 Points of Division (9)
These statements show significant disagreement between opinion groups.
Export & Share
📊 Methodology
Clustering Method: Agglomerative clustering with PCA dimensionality reduction
Consensus Criteria: ≥70% overall agreement AND ≥60% agreement in each opinion group
Bridge Criteria: High mean agreement (≥65%) with low variance (<0.15) across groups
Divisive Criteria: Controversy score ≥0.7 (close to 50/50 split)
Silhouette Score: Measures cluster quality (>0.5 = good, 0.3-0.5 = fair, <0.3 = weak)