Skip to main content

Consensus Analysis

Climate Action: Finding Common Ground

Opinion Groups
5
Participants
23
Statements
20
Cluster Quality
0.89
Silhouette Score
Analyzed: January 31, 2026 at 06:29 PM

Opinion Groups Visualization

How to read this chart:

  • Each dot represents a participant
  • Colors show different opinion groups
  • Closer dots = more similar voting patterns
  • Hover over dots to see participant details

What Each Group Believes

These are the statements each opinion group agrees on most strongly. This helps understand the core beliefs that define each group.

Group 1

5 participants

Top beliefs:

  • We need practical solutions, not just rhetoric
    100% agree 5 votes in group
  • Economic growth and environmental protection can coexist
    80% agree 5 votes in group
  • Electric vehicles should receive government subsidies
    75% agree 4 votes in group
  • Climate education should be mandatory in schools
    75% agree 4 votes in group
  • Wealthy nations should pay more for climate action
    75% agree 4 votes in group

Group 3

7 participants

Top beliefs:

  • Economic growth and environmental protection can coexist
    100% agree 7 votes in group
  • We need practical solutions, not just rhetoric
    100% agree 7 votes in group
  • We should prioritize economic growth over environmental regulations
    100% agree 7 votes in group
  • Technology alone cannot solve the climate crisis
    100% agree 7 votes in group
  • Climate change is a real and urgent problem
    0% agree 7 votes in group

Group 5

7 participants

Top beliefs:

  • Climate change is a real and urgent problem
    100% agree 7 votes in group
  • We need to invest more in renewable energy
    100% agree 6 votes in group
  • Protecting the environment benefits everyone
    100% agree 6 votes in group
  • Economic growth and environmental protection can coexist
    100% agree 6 votes in group
  • Local communities should have a say in environmental policies
    100% agree 6 votes in group

🟢 Areas of Consensus (1)

These statements have broad agreement across all opinion groups.

Economic growth and environmental protection can coexist
20 agree · 0 disagree · 1 unsure 100% agreement

🟡 Bridge Statements (4)

These statements unite different opinion groups and offer common ground.

Economic growth and environmental protection can coexist
20 agree · 0 disagree · 1 unsure
We need practical solutions, not just rhetoric
17 agree · 0 disagree · 4 unsure
We should prioritize economic growth over environmental regulations
18 agree · 2 disagree · 2 unsure
Technology alone cannot solve the climate crisis
18 agree · 0 disagree · 3 unsure

🔴 Points of Division (9)

These statements show significant disagreement between opinion groups.

Local communities should have a say in environmental policies
8 agree · 8 disagree · 5 unsure 100% controversy
Individual actions matter more than government policies
7 agree · 7 disagree · 7 unsure 100% controversy
Nuclear energy is essential for fighting climate change
9 agree · 5 disagree · 7 unsure 71% controversy
Carbon taxes are an effective way to reduce emissions
8 agree · 6 disagree · 8 unsure 86% controversy
Corporations should be held accountable for environmental damage
8 agree · 6 disagree · 7 unsure 86% controversy
We need stricter regulations on industrial emissions
9 agree · 9 disagree · 3 unsure 100% controversy
Tree planting initiatives are the best way to combat climate change
9 agree · 5 disagree · 7 unsure 71% controversy
International cooperation is essential for climate action
10 agree · 5 disagree · 6 unsure 67% controversy
We need to focus on adaptation as much as mitigation
9 agree · 5 disagree · 7 unsure 71% controversy

📊 Methodology

Clustering Method: Agglomerative clustering with PCA dimensionality reduction

Consensus Criteria: ≥70% overall agreement AND ≥60% agreement in each opinion group

Bridge Criteria: High mean agreement (≥65%) with low variance (<0.15) across groups

Divisive Criteria: Controversy score ≥0.7 (close to 50/50 split)

Silhouette Score: Measures cluster quality (>0.5 = good, 0.3-0.5 = fair, <0.3 = weak)