Second Amendment Roundup: Hawaii's Ban on Firearms on Property Open to the Public

Politics
United States
Started January 16, 2026

In Wolford, the Supreme Court should clarify the facial/as-applied issue

🗳️ Be one of the first to share your view
5 statements to vote on • Your perspective matters
📊 Progress to Consensus Analysis Need: 7+ statements, 50+ votes
Statements 5/7
Total Votes 0/50
💡 Keep voting and adding statements to unlock consensus insights

You're voting anonymously

Your votes are stored locally in your browser. Create an account to have your votes included in consensus analysis.

CLAIM Posted by will Jan 16, 2026
Hawaii's firearm ban could set a dangerous precedent, limiting the rights of law-abiding citizens to carry firearms in public spaces.
0 total votes
CLAIM Posted by will Jan 16, 2026
Restricting firearms on public property infringes on Second Amendment rights and undermines personal freedom and self-defense.
0 total votes
CLAIM Posted by will Jan 16, 2026
Public property should remain gun-free zones to protect vulnerable populations and encourage open, safe public interactions.
0 total votes
CLAIM Posted by will Jan 16, 2026
Hawaii's ban on firearms in public spaces promotes safety and reduces the risks of gun violence in communities.
0 total votes
CLAIM Posted by will Jan 16, 2026
The Supreme Court's ruling on the Wolford case is crucial for defining the balance between public safety and individual rights regarding firearm possession.
0 total votes

💡 How This Works

  • Add Statements: Post claims or questions (10-500 characters)
  • Vote: Agree, Disagree, or Unsure on each statement
  • Respond: Add detailed pro/con responses with evidence
  • Consensus: After enough participation, analysis reveals opinion groups and areas of agreement