Second Amendment Roundup: Hawaii's Ban on Firearms on Property Open to the Public
LinkedIn
Meta (Facebook)
X (Twitter)
BlueSky
WhatsApp
Telegram
Politics
United States
Started January 16, 2026
In Wolford, the Supreme Court should clarify the facial/as-applied issue
Source Articles
Second Amendment Roundup: Hawaii's Ban on Firearms on Property Open to the Public
Reason (United States) | Jan 16, 2026
🗳️ Join the conversation
5 statements to vote on •
Your perspective shapes the analysis
📊 Progress to Consensus Analysis
Need: 7+ statements, 50+ votes
Statements
5/7
Total Votes
0/50
💡 Keep voting and adding statements to unlock consensus insights
Your votes count
No account needed — your votes are saved and included in the consensus analysis. Create an account to track your voting history and add statements.
CLAIM
Posted by will
•
Jan 16, 2026
Public property should remain gun-free zones to protect vulnerable populations and encourage open, safe public interactions.
0
total votes
CLAIM
Posted by will
•
Jan 16, 2026
Hawaii's ban on firearms in public spaces promotes safety and reduces the risks of gun violence in communities.
0
total votes
CLAIM
Posted by will
•
Jan 16, 2026
Restricting firearms on public property infringes on Second Amendment rights and undermines personal freedom and self-defense.
0
total votes
CLAIM
Posted by will
•
Jan 16, 2026
The Supreme Court's ruling on the Wolford case is crucial for defining the balance between public safety and individual rights regarding firearm possession.
0
total votes
CLAIM
Posted by will
•
Jan 16, 2026
Hawaii's firearm ban could set a dangerous precedent, limiting the rights of law-abiding citizens to carry firearms in public spaces.
0
total votes
💡 How This Works
- • Add Statements: Post claims or questions (10-500 characters)
- • Vote: Agree, Disagree, or Unsure on each statement
- • Respond: Add detailed pro/con responses with evidence
- • Consensus: After enough participation, analysis reveals opinion groups and areas of agreement