レイモンド・チャンドラーと分割不定詞事件
LinkedIn
Meta (Facebook)
X (Twitter)
BlueSky
WhatsApp
Telegram
An Atlantic copy editor suddenly found herself at odds with the famous writer over one edit
ソース記事
The Atlantic (United States) | Mar 13, 2026
Your votes count
No account needed — your votes are saved and included in the consensus analysis. Create an account to track your voting history and add statements.
AI翻訳 · 原文を表示
Embracing split infinitives enriches language by allowing more expressive and nuanced writing, as demonstrated by Chandler's work.
AI翻訳 · 原文を表示
The debate over split infinitives highlights the evolving nature of language and the tension between artistic freedom and grammatical norms.
AI翻訳 · 原文を表示
Raymond Chandler's resistance to editing reflects a broader issue of authorial control versus editorial standards in publishing.
AI翻訳 · 原文を表示
Adhering to traditional grammar rules, like avoiding split infinitives, preserves the integrity and clarity of the English language.
AI翻訳 · 原文を表示
Copy editors play a crucial role in maintaining consistency and quality in writing, even if it means challenging famous authors like Chandler.
💡 How This Works
- • Add Statements: Post claims or questions (10-500 characters)
- • Vote: Agree, Disagree, or Unsure on each statement
- • Respond: Add detailed pro/con responses with evidence
- • Consensus: After enough participation, analysis reveals opinion groups and areas of agreement
Society Speaks is open and independent. Your support keeps civic discussion free from advertising and commercial influence.
Support us