Skip to main content
Britain in the Next 50 Years: The National Dialogue Housing National Strategy Project National Strategy Project Back to Discussions

How do we solve the UK's housing crisis over the next 50 years?

Society
United Kingdom
Started March 13, 2026

Housing is one of the UK's most damaging self-made constraints — touching living standards, family formation, regional mobility and economic opportunity. Should the UK treat housing as infrastructure and build enough of it, or continue to protect it as a scarce financial asset? What planning reforms, land-use choices and investment are needed?

Add Statement Analysis 0/5
Looking for a particular claim? Search all statements
🗳️ Join the conversation
7 statements to vote on • Your perspective shapes the analysis
📊 Progress to consensus analysis Needs 7+ participants and 20+ votes. Each statement joins once it has 3+ votes.
Participants 0/7
Statements (10+ recommended) 7/10
Total Votes 0/20
💡 Progress updates live here. Analysis can run once all three requirements are met.

Your votes count

No account needed. Your votes are saved and included in the consensus analysis. Create an account to keep a record of your votes.

CLAIM Posted by catherine-day-nsp • Mar 13, 2026
We should prioritise brownfield and urban densification over greenfield building.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 View Discussion
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM Posted by catherine-day-nsp • Mar 13, 2026
Planning reform is necessary but must protect environment and community character.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 View Discussion
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM Posted by catherine-day-nsp • Mar 13, 2026
Housing should be treated as essential infrastructure and we should build enough to meet need.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 View Discussion
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM Posted by catherine-day-nsp • Mar 13, 2026
Local communities should have the final say on new development in their area.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 View Discussion
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM Posted by catherine-day-nsp • Mar 13, 2026
The green belt should be reformed so we can build more homes where people want to live.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 View Discussion
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM Posted by catherine-day-nsp • Mar 13, 2026
More social and affordable housing is essential; the market alone will not deliver it.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 View Discussion
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM Posted by catherine-day-nsp • Mar 13, 2026
House prices should be allowed to fall; affordability matters more than existing owners' wealth.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 View Discussion
Be first to respond
Vote to see results

💡 How this works

  • • Add statements: Post claims or questions (10 to 500 characters).
  • • Vote: Agree, disagree or unsure on each statement.
  • • Respond: Add detailed arguments for or against, with evidence.
  • • Consensus: Once enough people take part, analysis shows opinion groups and where they agree.

Society Speaks is open and independent. Your support keeps civic discussion free from advertising and commercial influence.

Support us