National Strategy Project
英国は労働力の需要を満たしながら公衆の信頼を維持する形で、移民をどのように管理すべきか？
LinkedIn
Meta (Facebook)
X (Twitter)
BlueSky
WhatsApp
Telegram
If the UK wants a growing workforce and enough staff for health, care, construction and technology, migration matters. If it wants lower migration, it must substitute through higher domestic training, higher participation and later retirement. There is no free option. How should the UK design a stable, honest long-term approach to immigration?
Your votes count
No account needed — your votes are saved and included in the consensus analysis. Create an account to track your voting history and add statements.
AI翻訳 · 原文を表示
The focus should be on integration and cohesion, not just controlling numbers.
AI翻訳 · 原文を表示
Public consent matters; policy should follow what the majority say they want.
AI翻訳 · 原文を表示
The UK should set a stable long-term migration policy linked to labour and skills needs.
AI翻訳 · 原文を表示
Immigration levels should be reduced; integration works better when numbers are manageable.
AI翻訳 · 原文を表示
A points-based system is the right approach; we should refine it, not abandon it.
AI翻訳 · 原文を表示
Domestic training and workforce participation should be prioritised before relying on migration.
AI翻訳 · 原文を表示
Sectors like health and social care need migration; we should be honest about that dependency.
💡 How This Works
- • Add Statements: Post claims or questions (10-500 characters)
- • Vote: Agree, Disagree, or Unsure on each statement
- • Respond: Add detailed pro/con responses with evidence
- • Consensus: After enough participation, analysis reveals opinion groups and areas of agreement
Society Speaks is open and independent. Your support keeps civic discussion free from advertising and commercial influence.
Support us