Ga naar hoofdinhoud
Britain in the Next 50 Years: The National Dialogue Democracy & Governance National Strategy Project National Strategy Project Terug naar Discussies

Hoe herbouwen we vertrouwen in democratie en publieke instellingen?

Politics
United Kingdom
Gestart March 13, 2026

Trust in government, public institutions and democratic processes has fallen sharply. Trust is often treated as a cultural problem — but it is more often an engineering problem: reliability, responsiveness, integrity and fairness. What practical steps should the UK take to rebuild the relationship between citizens and the institutions that serve them?

Stelling toevoegen Analyse 0/5
Need to find a specific claim? Search all statements.
🗳️ Join the conversation
7 stellingen om op te stemmen • Your perspective shapes the analysis
📊 Progress to Consensus Analysis Need: 7+ participants, 20+ votes, 3+ votes per statement
Participants 0/7
Statements (7+ recommended) 7/7
Total Votes 0/20
💡 Progress updates live here. Final readiness is confirmed when all three requirements are met.

Your votes count

No account needed — your votes are saved and included in the consensus analysis. Create an account to track your voting history and add statements.

CLAIM Geplaatst door catherine-day-nsp • Mar 13, 2026
Het herstellen van vertrouwen gaat vooral om prestaties: betrouwbaarheid, responsiviteit en eerlijkheid.
AI-vertaald · Origineel tonen

Rebuilding trust is mainly about delivery: reliability, responsiveness and fairness.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 Discussie bekijken
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM Geplaatst door catherine-day-nsp • Mar 13, 2026
We hebben minder quango's en minder bureaucratie nodig; dat zou het vertrouwen herstellen.
AI-vertaald · Origineel tonen

We need fewer quangos and less bureaucracy; that would restore trust.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 Discussie bekijken
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM Geplaatst door catherine-day-nsp • Mar 13, 2026
Het echte probleem is media en polarisatie; instellingen zijn niet de voornaamste oorzaak.
AI-vertaald · Origineel tonen

The real problem is media and polarisation; institutions are not the main cause.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 Discussie bekijken
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM Geplaatst door catherine-day-nsp • Mar 13, 2026
Burgers zouden een formele rol moeten hebben bij het ter verantwoording roepen van instellingen, buiten verkiezingen om.
AI-vertaald · Origineel tonen

Citizens should have a formal role in holding institutions to account beyond elections.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 Discussie bekijken
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM Geplaatst door catherine-day-nsp • Mar 13, 2026
Transparantie en verantwoording — ook voor ministers en ambtenaren — moeten worden versterkt.
AI-vertaald · Origineel tonen

Transparency and accountability — including for ministers and officials — must be strengthened.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 Discussie bekijken
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM Geplaatst door catherine-day-nsp • Mar 13, 2026
Burgerschap en participatie van jongs af aan zouden op lange termijn het vertrouwen in de democratie herstellen.
AI-vertaald · Origineel tonen

Civic education and participation from an early age would rebuild long-term trust in democracy.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 Discussie bekijken
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM Geplaatst door catherine-day-nsp • Mar 13, 2026
Kieshervorming zou helpen; evenredige vertegenwoordiging zou het Parlement meer representatief maken.
AI-vertaald · Origineel tonen

Electoral reform would help; proportional representation would make Parliament more representative.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 Discussie bekijken
Be first to respond
Vote to see results

💡 How This Works

  • • Add Statements: Post claims or questions (10-500 characters)
  • • Vote: Agree, Disagree, or Unsure on each statement
  • • Respond: Add detailed pro/con responses with evidence
  • • Consensus: After enough participation, analysis reveals opinion groups and areas of agreement

Society Speaks is open and independent. Your support keeps civic discussion free from advertising and commercial influence.

Support us