英国应该如何在保持自由开放的数字经济的同时保护自己免受日益增长的网络威胁?
The UK is now a digital society sitting on privately run networks and global technology stacks. Cyber crime generates estimated losses of £14.7 billion annually — and a catastrophic cascade failure is a credible risk. How far should the state push baseline standards? How do we share burdens between firms, citizens and government? And how do we build an online "security state" — not a surveillance state?
您的投票很重要
无需账号。您的投票会被保存并计入共识分析。 创建账号即可保存您的投票记录。
AI 翻译 · 显示原文
The state should set baseline security standards for critical digital infrastructure.
AI 翻译 · 显示原文
Citizens and small businesses need better guidance and support to protect themselves online.
AI 翻译 · 显示原文
The UK should avoid surveillance-style solutions; security can be achieved without undermining privacy.
AI 翻译 · 显示原文
Strong encryption must be protected; backdoors would weaken security for everyone.
AI 翻译 · 显示原文
The public sector and critical national infrastructure need mandatory security requirements.
AI 翻译 · 显示原文
International cooperation is essential; the UK cannot solve cyber threats alone.
AI 翻译 · 显示原文
Industry should lead on standards; government should only step in where the market fails.
💡 使用说明
- • 添加陈述: 发布观点或问题(10 至 500 个字符)。
- • 投票: 对每条陈述选择同意、不同意或不确定。
- • 回应: 附上证据,详细阐述支持或反对的理由。
- • 共识: 参与人数足够后,分析会显示各意见群体及其共识所在。
Society Speaks 开放且独立。 您的支持让公民讨论远离广告和商业影响。
支持我们