メインコンテンツに移動

最高裁判所の歴史の今日:1989年3月21日

Politics
United States
March 22, 2026に開始

3/21/1989: Texas v. Johnson is argued. The post Today in Supreme Court History: March 21, 1989 appeared first on Reason.com

ソース記事

Need to find a specific claim? Search all statements.
🗳️ Join the conversation
5 投票すべき主張 • Your perspective shapes the analysis
📊 Progress to Consensus Analysis Need: 7+ participants, 20+ votes, 3+ votes per statement
Participants 0/7
Statements (7+ recommended) 5/7
Total Votes 0/20
💡 Progress updates live here. Final readiness is confirmed when all three requirements are met.

Your votes count

No account needed — your votes are saved and included in the consensus analysis. Create an account to track your voting history and add statements.

CLAIM 投稿者: will Mar 22, 2026
言論の自由は重要だが、国旗焼却のような特定の表現が地域社会と国家的アイデンティティに与える影響について、対話が必要である。
AI翻訳 · 原文を表示

While free speech is crucial, there should be a conversation about the impact of certain expressions, such as flag burning, on community and national identity.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM 投稿者: will Mar 22, 2026
国旗焼却は国家的シンボルを冒涜し、退役軍人による犠牲を損なうものであり、国家的統一を保つためこうした行為に対する規制を正当化する。
AI翻訳 · 原文を表示

Flag burning disrespects national symbols and undermines the sacrifices made by veterans, warranting restrictions on such acts to preserve national unity.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM 投稿者: will Mar 22, 2026
国旗焼却の権利を保護することは民主主義に不可欠であり、それにより周縁化された声が政府の報復を恐れずに抗議することができる。
AI翻訳 · 原文を表示

Protecting the right to burn the flag is essential for democracy, as it allows marginalized voices to protest without fear of government reprisal.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM 投稿者: will Mar 22, 2026
テキサス州対ジョンソン事件は言論の自由と社会的価値観の間の緊張を浮き彫りにしており、表現の限界について必要な議論を促している。
AI翻訳 · 原文を表示

The Texas v. Johnson case highlights the tension between free speech and societal values, prompting a necessary discussion on the limits of expression.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM 投稿者: will Mar 22, 2026
テキサス州対ジョンソン事件の判決は言論の自由の権利を支持し、国旗焼却のような象徴的言論が民主主義における重要な抗議表現であることを確認した。
AI翻訳 · 原文を表示

The ruling in Texas v. Johnson upheld free speech rights, affirming that symbolic speech, like flag burning, is a vital expression of dissent in a democracy.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results

💡 How This Works

  • Add Statements: Post claims or questions (10-500 characters)
  • Vote: Agree, Disagree, or Unsure on each statement
  • Respond: Add detailed pro/con responses with evidence
  • Consensus: After enough participation, analysis reveals opinion groups and areas of agreement

Society Speaks is open and independent. Your support keeps civic discussion free from advertising and commercial influence.

Support us