Greenland Is A Red Line
LinkedIn
Meta (Facebook)
X (Twitter)
BlueSky
WhatsApp
Telegram
Geopolitics
United States
Started January 17, 2026
Cross it, and our Constitution and collective security are finished
Source Articles
Greenland Is A Red Line
Andrew Sullivan (United States) | Jan 16, 2026
🗳️ Be one of the first to share your view
5 statements to vote on • Your perspective matters
📊 Progress to Consensus Analysis
Need: 7+ statements, 50+ votes
Statements
5/7
Total Votes
0/50
💡 Keep voting and adding statements to unlock consensus insights
You're voting anonymously
Your votes are stored locally in your browser. Create an account to have your votes included in consensus analysis.
CLAIM
Posted by will
•
Jan 17, 2026
Recognizing Greenland's strategic importance is essential for protecting our collective security and upholding constitutional values.
0 total votes
CLAIM
Posted by will
•
Jan 17, 2026
Crossing Greenland's geopolitical boundaries threatens not just our sovereignty but also our foundational constitutional rights.
0 total votes
CLAIM
Posted by will
•
Jan 17, 2026
Emphasizing Greenland as a 'red line' may unnecessarily escalate tensions and distract from more pressing domestic issues.
0 total votes
CLAIM
Posted by will
•
Jan 17, 2026
The fears surrounding Greenland's status are exaggerated; our Constitution can withstand diplomatic negotiations without compromising security.
0 total votes
CLAIM
Posted by will
•
Jan 17, 2026
The debate over Greenland's status highlights the need for a balanced approach to national security and constitutional integrity.
0 total votes
💡 How This Works
- • Add Statements: Post claims or questions (10-500 characters)
- • Vote: Agree, Disagree, or Unsure on each statement
- • Respond: Add detailed pro/con responses with evidence
- • Consensus: After enough participation, analysis reveals opinion groups and areas of agreement