Skip to main content
Back to Discussions

Additional Testimony Against the Proposed "Preserving a Sharia-Free America Act"

Politics
United States
Started March 26, 2026

I submitted some additional testimony to a House subcommittee, in response to questions from Rep. Mary Gay Scanlon

Source Articles

Add Statement Analysis 0/5
Need to find a specific claim? Search all statements.
🗳️ Join the conversation
5 statements to vote on • Your perspective shapes the analysis
📊 Progress to Consensus Analysis Need: 7+ participants, 20+ votes, 3+ votes per statement
Participants 0/7
Statements (7+ recommended) 5/7
Total Votes 0/20
💡 Progress updates live here. Final readiness is confirmed when all three requirements are met.

Your votes count

No account needed — your votes are saved and included in the consensus analysis. Create an account to track your voting history and add statements.

CLAIM Posted by will • Mar 26, 2026
The 'Preserving a Sharia-Free America Act' threatens religious freedom and undermines the constitutional principle of separation of church and state.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 View Discussion
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM Posted by will • Mar 26, 2026
While concerns about Sharia law are valid, we must ensure that laws do not discriminate against any religion or culture.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 View Discussion
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM Posted by will • Mar 26, 2026
This act is essential to protect American values and ensure that no foreign legal system influences our judicial system.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 View Discussion
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM Posted by will • Mar 26, 2026
The proposed act could lead to increased discrimination against Muslim communities, further marginalizing already vulnerable populations.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 View Discussion
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM Posted by will • Mar 26, 2026
Debates around this act highlight the need for clarity on what constitutes foreign influence in our legal system, requiring careful examination.
Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 View Discussion
Be first to respond
Vote to see results

💡 How This Works

  • • Add Statements: Post claims or questions (10-500 characters)
  • • Vote: Agree, Disagree, or Unsure on each statement
  • • Respond: Add detailed pro/con responses with evidence
  • • Consensus: After enough participation, analysis reveals opinion groups and areas of agreement

Society Speaks is open and independent. Your support keeps civic discussion free from advertising and commercial influence.

Support us