Ir al contenido principal
Volver a Discusiones

Testimonio Adicional en Contra de la Propuesta "Ley por una América Libre de la Sharia"

Politics
United States
Iniciada March 26, 2026

I submitted some additional testimony to a House subcommittee, in response to questions from Rep. Mary Gay Scanlon

Artículos de Fuentes

Añadir afirmación Análisis 0/5
Need to find a specific claim? Search all statements.
🗳️ Join the conversation
5 afirmaciones para votar • Your perspective shapes the analysis
📊 Progress to Consensus Analysis Need: 7+ participants, 20+ votes, 3+ votes per statement
Participants 0/7
Statements (7+ recommended) 5/7
Total Votes 0/20
💡 Progress updates live here. Final readiness is confirmed when all three requirements are met.

Your votes count

No account needed — your votes are saved and included in the consensus analysis. Create an account to track your voting history and add statements.

CLAIM Publicado por will • Mar 26, 2026
La "Ley Preservando una América Libre de Sharia" amenaza la libertad religiosa y socava el principio constitucional de separación entre la iglesia y el estado.
Traducido por IA · Ver original

The 'Preserving a Sharia-Free America Act' threatens religious freedom and undermines the constitutional principle of separation of church and state.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 Ver discusión
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM Publicado por will • Mar 26, 2026
Si bien las preocupaciones sobre la ley Sharia son válidas, debemos asegurar que las leyes no discriminen contra ninguna religión ni cultura.
Traducido por IA · Ver original

While concerns about Sharia law are valid, we must ensure that laws do not discriminate against any religion or culture.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 Ver discusión
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM Publicado por will • Mar 26, 2026
Esta ley es esencial para proteger los valores estadounidenses y garantizar que ningún sistema legal extranjero influya en nuestro sistema judicial.
Traducido por IA · Ver original

This act is essential to protect American values and ensure that no foreign legal system influences our judicial system.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 Ver discusión
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM Publicado por will • Mar 26, 2026
La ley propuesta podría llevar a una mayor discriminación contra las comunidades musulmanas, marginalizando aún más a poblaciones ya vulnerables.
Traducido por IA · Ver original

The proposed act could lead to increased discrimination against Muslim communities, further marginalizing already vulnerable populations.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 Ver discusión
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM Publicado por will • Mar 26, 2026
Los debates en torno a esta ley destacan la necesidad de claridad sobre qué constituye influencia extranjera en nuestro sistema legal, lo que requiere un examen cuidadoso.
Traducido por IA · Ver original

Debates around this act highlight the need for clarity on what constitutes foreign influence in our legal system, requiring careful examination.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 Ver discusión
Be first to respond
Vote to see results

💡 How This Works

  • • Add Statements: Post claims or questions (10-500 characters)
  • • Vote: Agree, Disagree, or Unsure on each statement
  • • Respond: Add detailed pro/con responses with evidence
  • • Consensus: After enough participation, analysis reveals opinion groups and areas of agreement

Society Speaks is open and independent. Your support keeps civic discussion free from advertising and commercial influence.

Support us