주요 콘텐츠로 건너뛰기
토론으로 돌아가기

제안된 "셰리아 없는 미국 보존법"에 대한 추가 증언

Politics
United States
March 26, 2026에 시작됨

I submitted some additional testimony to a House subcommittee, in response to questions from Rep. Mary Gay Scanlon

출처 기사

진술 추가 분석 0/5
Need to find a specific claim? Search all statements.
🗳️ Join the conversation
5 투표할 진술 • Your perspective shapes the analysis
📊 Progress to Consensus Analysis Need: 7+ participants, 20+ votes, 3+ votes per statement
Participants 0/7
Statements (7+ recommended) 5/7
Total Votes 0/20
💡 Progress updates live here. Final readiness is confirmed when all three requirements are met.

Your votes count

No account needed — your votes are saved and included in the consensus analysis. Create an account to track your voting history and add statements.

CLAIM 게시자: will • Mar 26, 2026
'미국 샤리아 배제법'은 종교의 자유를 위협하며 정교 분리의 헌법적 원칙을 훼손한다.
AI 번역 · 원문 보기

The 'Preserving a Sharia-Free America Act' threatens religious freedom and undermines the constitutional principle of separation of church and state.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 토론 보기
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM 게시자: will • Mar 26, 2026
샤리아 법에 대한 우려는 타당하지만, 우리는 법이 어떤 종교나 문화도 차별하지 않도록 보장해야 합니다.
AI 번역 · 원문 보기

While concerns about Sharia law are valid, we must ensure that laws do not discriminate against any religion or culture.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 토론 보기
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM 게시자: will • Mar 26, 2026
이 법안은 미국의 가치를 보호하고 어떤 외국 법체계도 우리의 사법부에 영향을 미치지 않도록 하는 데 필수적입니다.
AI 번역 · 원문 보기

This act is essential to protect American values and ensure that no foreign legal system influences our judicial system.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 토론 보기
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM 게시자: will • Mar 26, 2026
제안된 법안은 무슬림 공동체에 대한 차별 증가로 이어질 수 있으며, 이미 취약한 인구를 더욱 소외시킬 수 있습니다.
AI 번역 · 원문 보기

The proposed act could lead to increased discrimination against Muslim communities, further marginalizing already vulnerable populations.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 토론 보기
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM 게시자: will • Mar 26, 2026
이 법안을 둘러싼 논쟁은 우리 법체계에서 외국의 영향력이 무엇을 의미하는지에 대한 명확성의 필요성을 강조하며, 신중한 검토를 요구합니다.
AI 번역 · 원문 보기

Debates around this act highlight the need for clarity on what constitutes foreign influence in our legal system, requiring careful examination.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 토론 보기
Be first to respond
Vote to see results

💡 How This Works

  • • Add Statements: Post claims or questions (10-500 characters)
  • • Vote: Agree, Disagree, or Unsure on each statement
  • • Respond: Add detailed pro/con responses with evidence
  • • Consensus: After enough participation, analysis reveals opinion groups and areas of agreement

Society Speaks is open and independent. Your support keeps civic discussion free from advertising and commercial influence.

Support us