Ga naar hoofdinhoud
Terug naar Discussies

Aanvullend getuigenis tegen de voorgestelde "Preserving a Sharia-Free America Act"

Politics
United States
Gestart March 26, 2026

I submitted some additional testimony to a House subcommittee, in response to questions from Rep. Mary Gay Scanlon

Bronartikel

Stelling toevoegen Analyse 0/5
Need to find a specific claim? Search all statements.
🗳️ Join the conversation
5 stellingen om op te stemmen • Your perspective shapes the analysis
📊 Progress to Consensus Analysis Need: 7+ participants, 20+ votes, 3+ votes per statement
Participants 0/7
Statements (7+ recommended) 5/7
Total Votes 0/20
💡 Progress updates live here. Final readiness is confirmed when all three requirements are met.

Your votes count

No account needed — your votes are saved and included in the consensus analysis. Create an account to track your voting history and add statements.

CLAIM Geplaatst door will • Mar 26, 2026
De 'Preserving a Sharia-Free America Act' bedreigt de religievrijheid en ondermijnt het constitutionele beginsel van scheiding van kerk en staat.
AI-vertaald · Origineel tonen

The 'Preserving a Sharia-Free America Act' threatens religious freedom and undermines the constitutional principle of separation of church and state.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 Discussie bekijken
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM Geplaatst door will • Mar 26, 2026
Hoewel zorgen over de Sharia-wet terecht zijn, moeten we ervoor zorgen dat wetten geen discriminatie tegen enig geloof of cultuur bevatten.
AI-vertaald · Origineel tonen

While concerns about Sharia law are valid, we must ensure that laws do not discriminate against any religion or culture.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 Discussie bekijken
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM Geplaatst door will • Mar 26, 2026
Deze wet is essentieel om Amerikaanse waarden te beschermen en ervoor te zorgen dat geen buitenlands rechtsstelsel invloed heeft op ons gerechtelijk systeem.
AI-vertaald · Origineel tonen

This act is essential to protect American values and ensure that no foreign legal system influences our judicial system.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 Discussie bekijken
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM Geplaatst door will • Mar 26, 2026
De voorgestelde wet zou kunnen leiden tot verhoogde discriminatie tegen moslimgemeenschappen, waardoor reeds kwetsbare bevolkingsgroepen verder aan de marginalisering worden onderworpen.
AI-vertaald · Origineel tonen

The proposed act could lead to increased discrimination against Muslim communities, further marginalizing already vulnerable populations.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 Discussie bekijken
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM Geplaatst door will • Mar 26, 2026
Debatten rond deze wet benadrukken de noodzaak van duidelijkheid over wat buitenlandse invloed in ons rechtsstelsel vormt, wat zorgvuldige analyse vereist.
AI-vertaald · Origineel tonen

Debates around this act highlight the need for clarity on what constitutes foreign influence in our legal system, requiring careful examination.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 Discussie bekijken
Be first to respond
Vote to see results

💡 How This Works

  • • Add Statements: Post claims or questions (10-500 characters)
  • • Vote: Agree, Disagree, or Unsure on each statement
  • • Respond: Add detailed pro/con responses with evidence
  • • Consensus: After enough participation, analysis reveals opinion groups and areas of agreement

Society Speaks is open and independent. Your support keeps civic discussion free from advertising and commercial influence.

Support us