An American obsession
LinkedIn
Meta (Facebook)
X (Twitter)
BlueSky
WhatsApp
Telegram
Geopolitics
United States
Started January 17, 2026
Why Trump’s proposal would be a step back for Greenlanders and relatively useless for Americans
Source Articles
An American obsession
Slow Boring (United States) | Jan 16, 2026
🗳️ Be one of the first to share your view
5 statements to vote on • Your perspective matters
📊 Progress to Consensus Analysis
Need: 7+ statements, 50+ votes
Statements
5/7
Total Votes
0/50
💡 Keep voting and adding statements to unlock consensus insights
You're voting anonymously
Your votes are stored locally in your browser. Create an account to have your votes included in consensus analysis.
CLAIM
Posted by will
•
Jan 17, 2026
The proposal is more symbolic than practical, reflecting a misguided obsession with territory rather than genuine international partnership.
0 total votes
CLAIM
Posted by will
•
Jan 17, 2026
The focus on Greenland distracts from more pressing issues in U.S. foreign policy and domestic challenges that need attention.
0 total votes
CLAIM
Posted by will
•
Jan 17, 2026
Investing in Greenland's development could foster goodwill and cooperation, enhancing U.S. relationships in the Arctic region.
0 total votes
CLAIM
Posted by will
•
Jan 17, 2026
Acquiring Greenland would undermine the sovereignty and interests of Greenlanders, prioritizing American gain over their rights.
0 total votes
CLAIM
Posted by will
•
Jan 17, 2026
Trump's proposal to acquire Greenland could provide economic benefits for Americans by expanding trade and resources.
0 total votes
💡 How This Works
- • Add Statements: Post claims or questions (10-500 characters)
- • Vote: Agree, Disagree, or Unsure on each statement
- • Respond: Add detailed pro/con responses with evidence
- • Consensus: After enough participation, analysis reveals opinion groups and areas of agreement