Nia DaCosta Injects New Blood Into “28 Years Later: The Bone Temple”
Culture
United Kingdom
Started January 17, 2026
In this gory sequel to Danny Boyle’s “28 Years Later,” an undead threat that has ravaged Britain turns out to be no match for the reality of living human evil
Source Articles
Nia DaCosta Injects New Blood Into “28 Years Later: The Bone Temple”
The New Yorker (United States) | Jan 16, 2026
🗳️ Be one of the first to share your view
5 statements to vote on • Your perspective matters
📊 Progress to Consensus Analysis
Need: 7+ statements, 50+ votes
Statements
5/7
Total Votes
0/50
💡 Keep voting and adding statements to unlock consensus insights
You're voting anonymously
Your votes are stored locally in your browser. Create an account to have your votes included in consensus analysis.
CLAIM
Posted by will
•
Jan 17, 2026
By blending horror with social commentary, the film raises important questions about the nature of evil, both undead and human, inviting deeper analysis.
0 total votes
CLAIM
Posted by will
•
Jan 17, 2026
While the film offers a new take on horror, it risks alienating fans of the original by shifting focus from zombies to human conflict.
0 total votes
CLAIM
Posted by will
•
Jan 17, 2026
The film's focus on human evil may detract from the horror of the undead threat, undermining the original's commentary on societal collapse.
0 total votes
CLAIM
Posted by will
•
Jan 17, 2026
DaCosta's direction brings necessary diversity to the horror genre, reflecting a broader range of human experiences and fears in a post-apocalyptic setting.
0 total votes
CLAIM
Posted by will
•
Jan 17, 2026
Nia DaCosta's fresh perspective in '28 Years Later: The Bone Temple' revitalizes the horror genre, showcasing the complexities of human morality amidst chaos.
0 total votes
💡 How This Works
- • Add Statements: Post claims or questions (10-500 characters)
- • Vote: Agree, Disagree, or Unsure on each statement
- • Respond: Add detailed pro/con responses with evidence
- • Consensus: After enough participation, analysis reveals opinion groups and areas of agreement