加拿大重大问题:油砂、碳价和气候领导力
Can Canada credibly claim climate leadership while remaining one of the world's largest oil producers?
如何理解这些陈述
此背景可能为机器翻译,质量或有差异。
请先对你的当前观点投票。此框中的参考资料是可选的背景——它们不是测试,我们在你参与后会展示更多观点和分析(共识地图和旅程总结)。
参考资料旨在提供机构多样性(例如官方数据、立法机构、国际组织和独立研究)。收录不代表赞同;外部网站遵循自己的编辑标准。
您的投票记录了您今天的想法 — 您不需要先阅读下面的可选参考资料。它们解释了我们如何框架化陈述。投票后,使用共识分析(解锁时)和您的旅程总结进行后续阅读。
主题完成!
你对此主题中的每个陈述都进行了投票 (7)。
AI 翻译 · 显示原文
Canada cannot credibly claim climate leadership while continuing to expand oil sands production.
AI 翻译 · 显示原文
Canada should be a global leader in protecting its boreal forests as a major terrestrial carbon sink.
AI 翻译 · 显示原文
Clean electricity should constitute 100% of Canada's grid by 2035 — the resources and technology to achieve this exist.
AI 翻译 · 显示原文
Canada should introduce a moratorium on new oil and gas export permits while the country develops a binding long-term energy transition plan.
AI 翻译 · 显示原文
The federal carbon price is the most cost-effective policy instrument for reducing Canadian emissions, even when it is politically contested.
AI 翻译 · 显示原文
Federal and provincial climate policies are insufficiently coordinated to achieve Canada's Paris Agreement commitments.
AI 翻译 · 显示原文
The Trans Mountain pipeline expansion should have been cancelled on environmental and Indigenous rights grounds.