加拿大重大问题：选举改革、参议院和民主制度
LinkedIn
Meta (Facebook)
X (Twitter)
BlueSky
WhatsApp
Telegram
FPTP versus proportional representation, Senate reform, and trust in Canadian democratic institutions.
如何理解这些陈述
此背景可能为机器翻译，质量或有差异。
请先对你的当前观点投票。此框中的参考资料是可选的背景——它们不是测试，我们在你参与后会展示更多观点和分析（共识地图和旅程总结）。
参考资料旨在提供机构多样性（例如官方数据、立法机构、国际组织和独立研究）。收录不代表赞同；外部网站遵循自己的编辑标准。
您的投票记录了您今天的想法 — 您不需要先阅读下面的可选参考资料。它们解释了我们如何框架化陈述。投票后，使用共识分析（解锁时）和您的旅程总结进行后续阅读。
主题完成！
你对此主题中的每个陈述都进行了投票 (7)。
AI 翻译 · 显示原文
Supreme Court justices should be confirmed by a parliamentary committee rather than appointed solely by the Prime Minister.
AI 翻译 · 显示原文
Municipal governments need substantially more financial autonomy and tax powers to address urban challenges.
AI 翻译 · 显示原文
The Senate should be abolished or replaced with an elected body with a democratic mandate representing provinces.
AI 翻译 · 显示原文
Mandatory lobbying transparency should be strengthened so citizens can see who is influencing federal policy decisions.
AI 翻译 · 显示原文
Canada should introduce fixed federal election dates, removing the Prime Minister's discretionary power to call early elections.
AI 翻译 · 显示原文
The power of the Prime Minister's Office over the government and Parliament is excessive and requires legislative constraints.
AI 翻译 · 显示原文
Canada should replace first-past-the-post with a proportional representation system, as was promised in the 2015 federal election.