新加坡的大问题：种族和谐、外来人才和新加坡身份认同
LinkedIn
Meta (Facebook)
X (Twitter)
BlueSky
WhatsApp
Telegram
The CMIO framework, foreign talent policy, and what Singaporean identity means in a diverse society.
如何理解这些陈述
此背景可能为机器翻译，质量或有差异。
请先对你的当前观点投票。此框中的参考资料是可选的背景——它们不是测试，我们在你参与后会展示更多观点和分析（共识地图和旅程总结）。
参考资料旨在提供机构多样性（例如官方数据、立法机构、国际组织和独立研究）。收录不代表赞同；外部网站遵循自己的编辑标准。
你的投票记录你今天的想法 — 你不需要事先阅读下面的可选参考资料。这些资料解释了我们如何框架化陈述。投票后，使用共识分析（解锁后）和你的旅程回顾进行后续阅读。
主题完成！
你对此主题中的每个陈述都进行了投票 (7)。
AI 翻译 · 显示原文
Singapore's social cohesion is a genuine asset that requires ongoing active policy investment.
AI 翻译 · 显示原文
Singapore's government-defined CMIO (Chinese/Malay/Indian/Other) racial framework is increasingly outdated and should be reformed.
AI 翻译 · 显示原文
The repeal of Section 377A was the right decision for an inclusive and modern Singapore.
AI 翻译 · 显示原文
Foreign talent in Singapore has made an essential contribution to its success and should not be characterised as a threat to Singaporeans.
AI 翻译 · 显示原文
Singapore should introduce a national eldercare leave entitlement allowing workers to take paid leave to care for aging family members.
AI 翻译 · 显示原文
Singapore should make it easier for long-term residents who have contributed to the country to access permanent residency and citizenship.
AI 翻译 · 显示原文
More needs to be done to address persistent discrimination against Malay and Indian Singaporeans in employment.