Skip to main content

Big questions for the UK: Parliament, voting, and constitutional reform

Politics
United Kingdom
Started April 17, 2026

Lords reform, electoral systems, judicial independence, and the erosion of democratic norms.

Before you vote

These are institutional design questions — not about any party's current position. Key sources: Electoral Reform Society, Constitution Unit UCL, Supreme Court judgment in Miller (2019), Venice Commission assessments of UK constitutional changes.

Need to find a specific claim? Search all statements.
🗳️ Join the conversation
7 statements to vote on • Your perspective shapes the analysis
📊 Progress to Consensus Analysis Need: 7+ participants, 20+ votes, 3+ votes per statement
Participants 0/7
Statements (7+ recommended) 7/7
Total Votes 0/20
💡 Progress updates live here. Final readiness is confirmed when all three requirements are met.

Your votes count

No account needed — your votes are saved and included in the consensus analysis. Create an account to track your voting history and add statements.

CLAIM Posted by will Apr 17, 2026
The House of Lords should be replaced by an elected second chamber with a clear democratic mandate.
0 total votes
CLAIM Posted by will Apr 17, 2026
Voter ID requirements introduced in 2023 disenfranchise legitimately entitled voters more than they prevent fraud.
0 total votes
CLAIM Posted by will Apr 17, 2026
The minimum voting age should be reduced to 16 for all UK elections, as it already is for Scottish Parliament and Welsh Senedd elections.
0 total votes
CLAIM Posted by will Apr 17, 2026
MP recall should be triggerable directly by constituents through a petition threshold, not only through a parliamentary committee.
0 total votes
CLAIM Posted by will Apr 17, 2026
First-past-the-post should be replaced with proportional representation for UK general elections.
0 total votes
CLAIM Posted by will Apr 17, 2026
Political donation transparency rules should be substantially tightened to limit the influence of large donors on government policy.
0 total votes
CLAIM Posted by will Apr 17, 2026
The Supreme Court's power to hold government actions unlawful under constitutional principles should be protected, not curtailed.
0 total votes

💡 How This Works

  • Add Statements: Post claims or questions (10-500 characters)
  • Vote: Agree, Disagree, or Unsure on each statement
  • Respond: Add detailed pro/con responses with evidence
  • Consensus: After enough participation, analysis reveals opinion groups and areas of agreement

Society Speaks is open and independent. Your support keeps civic discussion free from advertising and commercial influence.

Support us