美国的大问题:气候政策、能源和美国经济
Can the US lead on climate while protecting jobs and energy security?
来源文章
Science Magazine (United States) | Mar 31, 2026
Science Magazine (United States) | Apr 07, 2026
Science Magazine (United States) | Apr 13, 2026
如何理解这些声明
此背景可能为机器翻译,质量或有差异。
请先对你的当前观点投票。上方的相关文章是可选的时事背景;此框中的参考资料是进一步的可选背景——这不是测试。在你参与后,我们会展示更多观点和分析(共识地图和旅程总结)。
参考资料旨在提供机构多样性(例如官方数据、立法机构、国际组织和独立研究)。收录不代表赞同;外部网站遵循自己的编辑标准。
你的投票记录你今天的想法 — 你不需要先阅读下面的可选参考资料。它们说明我们如何框架化声明。投票后,使用共识分析(解锁时)和你的旅程总结进行后续阅读。
主题完成!
你对此主题中的每个陈述都进行了投票 (7)。
AI 翻译 · 显示原文
New federal permits for LNG export terminals should be paused given their long-term lock-in of fossil fuel infrastructure.
AI 翻译 · 显示原文
The Inflation Reduction Act's clean energy investments should be protected — rolling them back would set US decarbonisation back by a decade.
AI 翻译 · 显示原文
The EPA's authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions must be maintained against legislative attempts to restrict it.
AI 翻译 · 显示原文
Federal agricultural subsidies should be substantially reoriented toward low-emissions and regenerative farming practices.
AI 翻译 · 显示原文
The federal government should create a carbon border adjustment mechanism to prevent carbon leakage from countries without equivalent climate policies.
AI 翻译 · 显示原文
States should not be permitted to block federally authorised clean energy infrastructure on their territory for political rather than technical reasons.
AI 翻译 · 显示原文
The United States should meet its nationally determined contribution under the Paris Agreement and fund it fully.