《纽约时报》:老年人很糟糕,我们应该夺走他们的东西
It's time do away with these societal "grifters" and "stowaways," says an eminent Yale professor
来源文章
Matt Taibbi (United States) | Apr 21, 2026
Your votes count
No account needed — your votes are saved and included in the consensus analysis. Create an account to track your voting history and add statements.
AI 翻译 · 显示原文
The debate about resource allocation between generations should consider individual contributions rather than blanket judgments about age groups.
AI 翻译 · 显示原文
Societal narratives that label older people as burdens hinder intergenerational solidarity and overlook their potential contributions to society.
AI 翻译 · 显示原文
Older individuals have contributed to society throughout their lives and deserve respect and support, not scapegoating as 'grifters' or 'stowaways'.
AI 翻译 · 显示原文
Reallocating resources could invigorate innovation and growth, but we must ensure that we do not neglect the dignity and needs of the elderly.
AI 翻译 · 显示原文
We should prioritize resources for the younger generation, as they are the future and deserve support over an aging population that has already benefitted.
💡 How This Works
- • Add Statements: Post claims or questions (10-500 characters)
- • Vote: Agree, Disagree, or Unsure on each statement
- • Respond: Add detailed pro/con responses with evidence
- • Consensus: After enough participation, analysis reveals opinion groups and areas of agreement
Society Speaks is open and independent. Your support keeps civic discussion free from advertising and commercial influence.
Support us