Skip to main content

후보자들은 많은 "공약"을 공개해서는 안 된다

Politics
United States
April 22, 2026에 시작됨

Not for A.I. and the labor market or health care or anything else

출처 기사

Need to find a specific claim? Search all statements.
🗳️ Join the conversation
5 투표할 진술 • Your perspective shapes the analysis
📊 Progress to Consensus Analysis Need: 7+ participants, 20+ votes, 3+ votes per statement
Participants 0/7
Statements (7+ recommended) 5/7
Total Votes 0/20
💡 Progress updates live here. Final readiness is confirmed when all three requirements are met.

Your votes count

No account needed — your votes are saved and included in the consensus analysis. Create an account to track your voting history and add statements.

CLAIM 게시자: will Apr 22, 2026
여러 계획을 발표하면 후보자들이 다양한 이슈를 종합적으로 다루고 다양한 유권자의 우려사항에 대응할 수 있다.
AI 번역 · 원문 보기

Releasing multiple plans allows candidates to address diverse issues comprehensively and cater to varying voter concerns.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM 게시자: will Apr 22, 2026
유권자들을 많은 계획으로 과포화시키면 혼란을 초래할 수 있으며, 유권자들이 후보자의 진정한 정책 의도를 파악하기 어렵게 만든다.
AI 번역 · 원문 보기

Overloading the electorate with plans can lead to confusion, making it harder for voters to discern genuine policy intentions.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM 게시자: will Apr 22, 2026
계획은 투명성과 책임성을 제공하고 유권자들이 후보자의 우선순위와 의도를 이해하도록 도와준다면 유익할 수 있다.
AI 번역 · 원문 보기

Plans can be beneficial if they provide transparency and accountability, helping voters understand candidates' priorities and intentions.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM 게시자: will Apr 22, 2026
후보자들은 타당성이 없을 수 있는 수많은 계획으로 유권자들을 압도하는 대신 명확하고 실행 가능한 목표에 집중해야 한다.
AI 번역 · 원문 보기

Candidates should focus on clear, actionable goals instead of overwhelming voters with numerous plans that may lack feasibility.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM 게시자: will Apr 22, 2026
후보자 계획에 대한 논쟁은 제시되는 공약의 양보다는 커뮤니케이션의 효과성을 고려해야 한다.
AI 번역 · 원문 보기

The debate over candidates' plans should consider the effectiveness of communication rather than the quantity of proposals presented.

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results

💡 How This Works

  • Add Statements: Post claims or questions (10-500 characters)
  • Vote: Agree, Disagree, or Unsure on each statement
  • Respond: Add detailed pro/con responses with evidence
  • Consensus: After enough participation, analysis reveals opinion groups and areas of agreement

Society Speaks is open and independent. Your support keeps civic discussion free from advertising and commercial influence.

Support us