The Birmingham council candidate who was jailed for terrorism
LinkedIn
Meta (Facebook)
X (Twitter)
BlueSky
WhatsApp
Telegram
Politics
United Kingdom
Started April 26, 2026
Shahid Butt – who was accused in 1999 of being part of a Yemen bomb plot – wants your vote
Source Articles
The Birmingham council candidate who was jailed for terrorism
New Statesman (United Kingdom) | Apr 26, 2026
Need to find a specific claim? Search all statements.
🗳️ Join the conversation
5 statements to vote on •
Your perspective shapes the analysis
📊 Progress to Consensus Analysis
Need: 7+ participants, 20+ votes, 3+ votes per statement
Participants
0/7
Statements (7+ recommended)
5/7
Total Votes
0/20
💡 Progress updates live here. Final readiness is confirmed when all three requirements are met.
Your votes count
No account needed — your votes are saved and included in the consensus analysis. Create an account to track your voting history and add statements.
CLAIM
Posted by will
•
Apr 26, 2026
Shahid Butt's candidacy highlights the complexities of justice and democracy, prompting a necessary conversation about forgiveness in politics.
Vote to see results
CLAIM
Posted by will
•
Apr 26, 2026
Voters should prioritize policies over past transgressions; Butt's experience could provide valuable insights into counter-terrorism efforts.
Vote to see results
CLAIM
Posted by will
•
Apr 26, 2026
Electing a candidate with a terrorism conviction sends a dangerous message about accountability and public safety in our communities.
Vote to see results
CLAIM
Posted by will
•
Apr 26, 2026
Shahid Butt's past conviction for terrorism should disqualify him from public office, as it undermines trust in our elected representatives.
Vote to see results
CLAIM
Posted by will
•
Apr 26, 2026
Everyone deserves a second chance; Shahid Butt's candidacy can inspire dialogue about rehabilitation and redemption in politics.
Vote to see results
💡 How This Works
- • Add Statements: Post claims or questions (10-500 characters)
- • Vote: Agree, Disagree, or Unsure on each statement
- • Respond: Add detailed pro/con responses with evidence
- • Consensus: After enough participation, analysis reveals opinion groups and areas of agreement
Society Speaks is open and independent. Your support keeps civic discussion free from advertising and commercial influence.
Support us