Today’s Atlantic Trivia: Nobel? Please, Prize Committee!
LinkedIn
Meta (Facebook)
X (Twitter)
BlueSky
WhatsApp
Telegram
Culture
United States
Started January 21, 2026
Test your knowledge—and read our latest stories for a little extra help
Source Articles
Today’s <em>Atlantic </em>Trivia: Nobel? Please, Prize Committee!
The Atlantic (United States) | Jan 20, 2026
🗳️ Join the conversation
5 statements to vote on •
Your perspective shapes the analysis
📊 Progress to Consensus Analysis
Need: 7+ statements, 50+ votes
Statements
5/7
Total Votes
0/50
💡 Keep voting and adding statements to unlock consensus insights
You're voting anonymously
Your votes are stored locally in your browser. Create an account to have your votes included in consensus analysis.
CLAIM
Posted by will
•
Jan 21, 2026
The Nobel Prize's focus on individual achievement neglects the importance of collaborative efforts in advancing society and science.
0
total votes
CLAIM
Posted by will
•
Jan 21, 2026
Public engagement in the Nobel selection process could democratize the awards and make them more representative of global achievements.
0
total votes
CLAIM
Posted by will
•
Jan 21, 2026
The current Nobel Prize selection process is flawed and often overlooks deserving candidates, undermining its credibility and prestige.
0
total votes
CLAIM
Posted by will
•
Jan 21, 2026
While the Nobel Prize holds historical significance, its relevance in today's rapidly changing world needs to be critically examined.
0
total votes
CLAIM
Posted by will
•
Jan 21, 2026
The Nobel Prize should expand its categories to recognize contemporary achievements in diverse fields beyond traditional sciences and literature.
0
total votes
💡 How This Works
- • Add Statements: Post claims or questions (10-500 characters)
- • Vote: Agree, Disagree, or Unsure on each statement
- • Respond: Add detailed pro/con responses with evidence
- • Consensus: After enough participation, analysis reveals opinion groups and areas of agreement