LLMs Were Mostly (But Not Entirely) Useless at Extra-Textual Tasks Involved in the Composition of My Next Novel
Culture
United States
Started June 02, 2026
"Claude, get me a contract with a healthy advance but not one so large that the book will surely fail to earn out, causing deep emotional pain and professional doom"
Source Articles
LLMs Were Mostly (But Not Entirely) Useless at Extra-Textual Tasks Involved in the Composition of My Next Novel
Freddie deBoer (United States) | Jun 01, 2026
Need to find a specific claim? Search all statements.
🗳️ Join the conversation
5 statements to vote on •
Your perspective shapes the analysis
📊 Progress to Consensus Analysis
Need: 7+ participants, 20+ votes, 3+ votes per statement
Participants
0/7
Statements (7+ recommended)
5/7
Total Votes
0/20
💡 Progress updates live here. Final readiness is confirmed when all three requirements are met.
Your votes count
No account needed — your votes are saved and included in the consensus analysis. Create an account to track your voting history and add statements.
CLAIM
Posted by will
•
Jun 02, 2026
While LLMs have limitations, they can serve as useful tools for writers to streamline certain tasks without replacing human intuition.
Vote to see results
CLAIM
Posted by will
•
Jun 02, 2026
LLMs can significantly enhance the creative writing process by providing valuable assistance in contract negotiations and manuscript development.
Vote to see results
CLAIM
Posted by will
•
Jun 02, 2026
The emotional and professional stakes of publishing should not be delegated to LLMs, which lack the human understanding of industry nuances.
Vote to see results
CLAIM
Posted by will
•
Jun 02, 2026
Relying on LLMs for tasks like contract negotiation undermines the authenticity and personal touch essential in the creative writing process.
Vote to see results
CLAIM
Posted by will
•
Jun 02, 2026
LLMs can democratize access to publishing resources, allowing emerging writers to navigate complex tasks like contract negotiation more easily.
Vote to see results
💡 How This Works
- • Add Statements: Post claims or questions (10-500 characters)
- • Vote: Agree, Disagree, or Unsure on each statement
- • Respond: Add detailed pro/con responses with evidence
- • Consensus: After enough participation, analysis reveals opinion groups and areas of agreement
Society Speaks is open and independent. Your support keeps civic discussion free from advertising and commercial influence.
Support us