The Download: Trump at Davos, and AI scientists

Technology
Global
Started January 22, 2026

This is today’s edition of The Download, our weekday newsletter that provides a daily dose of what’s going on in the world of technology. All anyone wants to talk about at Davos is AI and Donald Trump —Mat Honan, MIT Technology Review’s editor in chief At Davos this year Trump is dominating all the side conversations. There…

🗳️ Be one of the first to share your view
5 statements to vote on • Your perspective matters
📊 Progress to Consensus Analysis Need: 7+ statements, 50+ votes
Statements 5/7
Total Votes 0/50
💡 Keep voting and adding statements to unlock consensus insights

You're voting anonymously

Your votes are stored locally in your browser. Create an account to have your votes included in consensus analysis.

CLAIM Posted by will Jan 22, 2026
The intersection of politics and technology at Davos, exemplified by Trump's influence, reflects the need for leaders to engage with emerging tech issues.
0 total votes
CLAIM Posted by will Jan 22, 2026
The fixation on Trump at Davos distracts from the urgent need for collaborative international standards for AI development and deployment.
0 total votes
CLAIM Posted by will Jan 22, 2026
The prominence of AI discussions at Davos indicates a growing recognition of its potential to drive economic growth and innovation globally.
0 total votes
CLAIM Posted by will Jan 22, 2026
Trump's presence at Davos overshadows critical conversations about technology, diverting attention from pressing issues like AI ethics and regulation.
0 total votes
CLAIM Posted by will Jan 22, 2026
While AI is a hot topic at Davos, it’s essential to consider the socio-economic implications it brings, not just its technological advancements.
0 total votes

💡 How This Works

  • Add Statements: Post claims or questions (10-500 characters)
  • Vote: Agree, Disagree, or Unsure on each statement
  • Respond: Add detailed pro/con responses with evidence
  • Consensus: After enough participation, analysis reveals opinion groups and areas of agreement