Davos Breakdown with Presidential Advisor Dr Pippa Malmgren

Geopolitics
Global
Started January 23, 2026

Francis and Konstantin are in conversation with Dr Pippa Malmgren, who joins live from Greenland. Dr Malmgren is an American economist, tech entrepreneur, former White House advisor and renowned geopolitics expert. The team breaks down Donald Trump’s Davos speech at the 2026 World Economic Forum – the Greenland controversy, his shift on tariffs, transatlantic tensions, NATO critique, and what this means for global security, markets and geopolitics. Join us for real analysis on: • Trump’s stra...

🗳️ Be one of the first to share your view
5 statements to vote on • Your perspective matters
📊 Progress to Consensus Analysis Need: 7+ statements, 50+ votes
Statements 5/7
Total Votes 0/50
💡 Keep voting and adding statements to unlock consensus insights

You're voting anonymously

Your votes are stored locally in your browser. Create an account to have your votes included in consensus analysis.

CLAIM Posted by will Jan 23, 2026
Trump's speech lacks a coherent strategy for addressing geopolitical challenges and could lead to further instability in international markets.
0 total votes
CLAIM Posted by will Jan 23, 2026
Transatlantic tensions are a sign of changing dynamics in global power, demanding a reevaluation of traditional alliances.
0 total votes
CLAIM Posted by will Jan 23, 2026
The Greenland controversy highlights the complexities of climate change and geopolitics, requiring nuanced dialogue on global security.
0 total votes
CLAIM Posted by will Jan 23, 2026
Critiquing NATO at Davos undermines collective security and could embolden adversaries, jeopardizing global peace.
0 total votes
CLAIM Posted by will Jan 23, 2026
Trump's shift on tariffs demonstrates a pragmatic approach to global economics that could stabilize international trade relations.
0 total votes

💡 How This Works

  • Add Statements: Post claims or questions (10-500 characters)
  • Vote: Agree, Disagree, or Unsure on each statement
  • Respond: Add detailed pro/con responses with evidence
  • Consensus: After enough participation, analysis reveals opinion groups and areas of agreement