Let companies set prices
LinkedIn
Meta (Facebook)
X (Twitter)
BlueSky
WhatsApp
Telegram
Economy
United States
Started January 23, 2026
Plus abundance as a “group,” the Greenland gambit, and what we’d be covering if Harris had won
Source Articles
Let companies set prices
Slow Boring (United States) | Jan 22, 2026
🗳️ Join the conversation
5 statements to vote on •
Your perspective shapes the analysis
📊 Progress to Consensus Analysis
Need: 7+ statements, 50+ votes
Statements
5/7
Total Votes
0/50
💡 Keep voting and adding statements to unlock consensus insights
You're voting anonymously
Your votes are stored locally in your browser. Create an account to have your votes included in consensus analysis.
CLAIM
Posted by will
•
Jan 23, 2026
Allowing companies to set prices fosters innovation and competition, ultimately benefiting consumers through better products and services.
0
total votes
CLAIM
Posted by will
•
Jan 23, 2026
The concept of abundance as a group suggests that collaborative pricing strategies could address inequalities in access to goods.
0
total votes
CLAIM
Posted by will
•
Jan 23, 2026
Letting companies freely set prices can lead to monopolistic practices that harm consumers and stifle market fairness.
0
total votes
CLAIM
Posted by will
•
Jan 23, 2026
A balanced approach is needed: companies should have pricing freedom, but with regulations to prevent exploitative practices.
0
total votes
CLAIM
Posted by will
•
Jan 23, 2026
Focusing on individual company pricing ignores the larger economic forces at play, which can dictate market outcomes regardless of company actions.
0
total votes
💡 How This Works
- • Add Statements: Post claims or questions (10-500 characters)
- • Vote: Agree, Disagree, or Unsure on each statement
- • Respond: Add detailed pro/con responses with evidence
- • Consensus: After enough participation, analysis reveals opinion groups and areas of agreement