Skip to main content
Back to Discussions

America This Week, Jan 23, 2026: "Why Davos Sucks."

Politics
United States
Started January 24, 2026

Watch now (131 mins) | Donald Trump gets panned, Howard Lutnick inspires outrage, and Matt and Walter debate civil liberties in Minnesota

Source Articles

Add Statement Analysis 0/5
🗳️ Join the conversation
5 statements to vote on • Your perspective shapes the analysis
📊 Progress to Consensus Analysis Need: 7+ statements, 50+ votes
Statements 5/7
Total Votes 0/50
💡 Keep voting and adding statements to unlock consensus insights

Your votes count

No account needed — your votes are saved and included in the consensus analysis. Create an account to track your voting history and add statements.

CLAIM Posted by will • Jan 24, 2026
Outrage against figures like Howard Lutnick indicates a growing awareness of corporate accountability in a time of economic disparity.
💬 View Discussion
Be first to respond
0 total votes
CLAIM Posted by will • Jan 24, 2026
Donald Trump's continued prominence in political discourse highlights the deep divisions in American society that must be addressed for progress.
💬 View Discussion
Be first to respond
0 total votes
CLAIM Posted by will • Jan 24, 2026
The debate on civil liberties in Minnesota reflects broader national concerns about privacy and governmental overreach, warranting public engagement.
💬 View Discussion
Be first to respond
0 total votes
CLAIM Posted by will • Jan 24, 2026
Davos represents elitism that undermines democracy, and it's crucial to challenge the influence of wealthy individuals in global politics.
💬 View Discussion
Be first to respond
0 total votes
CLAIM Posted by will • Jan 24, 2026
Critiquing Davos as elitist ignores the potential for meaningful dialogue and collaboration among global leaders to address pressing issues.
💬 View Discussion
Be first to respond
0 total votes

💡 How This Works

  • • Add Statements: Post claims or questions (10-500 characters)
  • • Vote: Agree, Disagree, or Unsure on each statement
  • • Respond: Add detailed pro/con responses with evidence
  • • Consensus: After enough participation, analysis reveals opinion groups and areas of agreement