跳过至主要内容
翻译进行中 — 您的语言版本正在准备中,目前内容以英语显示。

'Scrap It and Start All Over': Ex-Bush and Obama Officials Say the War on Terror's Powers Have Gone Too Far

Politics
United States
开始于 July 10, 2026

Alberto Gonzales and Jeh Johnson are seen in front of a 9/11 backdrop

Need to find a specific claim? Search all statements.
🗳️ Join the conversation
5 条陈述待投票 • Your perspective shapes the analysis
📊 Progress to Consensus Analysis Need: 7+ participants, 20+ votes, 3+ votes per statement
Participants 0/7
Statements (7+ recommended) 5/7
Total Votes 0/20
💡 Progress updates live here. Final readiness is confirmed when all three requirements are met.

Your votes count

No account needed — your votes are saved and included in the consensus analysis. Create an account to track your voting history and add statements.

CLAIM 发布者 admin Jul 10, 2026
A balanced approach is needed; we must reform the War on Terror without completely discarding vital security measures that protect citizens.

翻译待处理

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM 发布者 admin Jul 10, 2026
The bipartisan acknowledgment of the War on Terror's excesses signifies a critical moment for reassessing government overreach in the name of security.

翻译待处理

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM 发布者 admin Jul 10, 2026
Scrapping the entire War on Terror framework overlooks the complexities of global terrorism and the need for targeted, effective responses.

翻译待处理

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM 发布者 admin Jul 10, 2026
Maintaining robust national security measures is essential, and dismantling the War on Terror framework could expose the U.S. to greater threats.

翻译待处理

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM 发布者 admin Jul 10, 2026
The expansive powers granted in the War on Terror have eroded civil liberties and should be re-evaluated for the sake of democracy.

翻译待处理

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results

💡 How This Works

  • Add Statements: Post claims or questions (10-500 characters)
  • Vote: Agree, Disagree, or Unsure on each statement
  • Respond: Add detailed pro/con responses with evidence
  • Consensus: After enough participation, analysis reveals opinion groups and areas of agreement

Society Speaks is open and independent. Your support keeps civic discussion free from advertising and commercial influence.

Support us