メインコンテンツに移動
翻訳中 — お使いの言語版を準備している間、このコンテンツは英語で表示されています。

MAGA's attack on science is even worse than it looks

Politics
United States
July 11, 2026に開始

The engine that powered history's greatest nation is in danger

ソース記事

Need to find a specific claim? Search all statements.
🗳️ Join the conversation
5 投票すべき主張 • Your perspective shapes the analysis
📊 Progress to Consensus Analysis Need: 7+ participants, 20+ votes, 3+ votes per statement
Participants 0/7
Statements (7+ recommended) 5/7
Total Votes 0/20
💡 Progress updates live here. Final readiness is confirmed when all three requirements are met.

Your votes count

No account needed — your votes are saved and included in the consensus analysis. Create an account to track your voting history and add statements.

CLAIM 投稿者: admin Jul 11, 2026
Criticism of scientific institutions can lead to necessary reforms and greater accountability, benefiting society in the long run.

翻訳準備中

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM 投稿者: admin Jul 11, 2026
Attacking science promotes ignorance and hinders progress, which could lead to severe consequences for global leadership and innovation.

翻訳準備中

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM 投稿者: admin Jul 11, 2026
While concerns about science are valid, we must also acknowledge that many Americans feel alienated by elite scientific communities.

翻訳準備中

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM 投稿者: admin Jul 11, 2026
The focus on science in policy-making can be overplayed; sometimes, local knowledge and community values are just as crucial in decision-making.

翻訳準備中

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results
CLAIM 投稿者: admin Jul 11, 2026
MAGA's anti-science rhetoric undermines public trust in experts, threatening our ability to tackle critical issues like climate change and public health.

翻訳準備中

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
Vote to see results

💡 How This Works

  • Add Statements: Post claims or questions (10-500 characters)
  • Vote: Agree, Disagree, or Unsure on each statement
  • Respond: Add detailed pro/con responses with evidence
  • Consensus: After enough participation, analysis reveals opinion groups and areas of agreement

Society Speaks is open and independent. Your support keeps civic discussion free from advertising and commercial influence.

Support us