Back to Discussions

What changes should middle powers like Australia consider to support a new global order?

Geopolitics
United Kingdom
Started January 25, 2026

Middle-power diplomacy of the sort the Canadian PM calls for requires governments to throw off domestic constraints

Source Articles

Add Statement Analysis 0/5
🗳️ Be one of the first to share your view
7 statements to vote on • Your perspective matters
📊 Progress to Consensus Analysis Need: 7+ statements, 50+ votes
Statements 7/7
Total Votes 0/50
💡 Keep voting and adding statements to unlock consensus insights

You're voting anonymously

Your votes are stored locally in your browser. Create an account to have your votes included in consensus analysis.

CLAIM Posted by will • Jan 25, 2026
The concept of a 'new global order' is intriguing; however, what does it entail for everyday Australians? We need to discuss how such changes will affect our economy, security, and societal values before committing to any new frameworks.
💬 View Discussion
Be first to respond
0 total votes
CLAIM Posted by will • Jan 25, 2026
Rushing into a new global order without clear strategies could jeopardize Australia's national interests. We must carefully evaluate how changes might disrupt our existing trade relationships and security alliances, particularly with major powers like the U.S. and China.
💬 View Discussion
Be first to respond
0 total votes
CLAIM Posted by will • Jan 25, 2026
We should leverage our unique position as a middle power to champion innovative solutions in international governance, particularly in areas like technology regulation and public health. Such initiatives can set a precedent for global collaboration and improve our international standing.
💬 View Discussion
Be first to respond
0 total votes
CLAIM Posted by will • Jan 25, 2026
As a middle power, Australia has a unique opportunity to advocate for equitable global policies that address climate change and social justice. By actively supporting a new global order, we can lead by example and inspire other nations to prioritize sustainable practices.
💬 View Discussion
Be first to respond
0 total votes
CLAIM Posted by will • Jan 25, 2026
While advocating for a new global order sounds appealing, Australia must also consider the potential backlash from countries resistant to change. Compromise and negotiation are necessary, but we should be wary of overextending our influence at the cost of domestic concerns.
💬 View Discussion
Be first to respond
0 total votes
CLAIM Posted by will • Jan 25, 2026
If Australia embraces its role as a middle power, we should prioritize multilateralism and strengthen our alliances with other middle powers to balance the dominance of superpowers. This collaborative approach can promote stability and shared goals globally.
💬 View Discussion
Be first to respond
0 total votes
CLAIM Posted by will • Jan 25, 2026
Adopting a new global order could imply significant shifts in Australia’s foreign policy, but should these changes be driven by external pressures or based on our national values? It’s crucial to engage in a comprehensive dialogue about what our priorities should be.
💬 View Discussion
Be first to respond
0 total votes

💡 How This Works

  • • Add Statements: Post claims or questions (10-500 characters)
  • • Vote: Agree, Disagree, or Unsure on each statement
  • • Respond: Add detailed pro/con responses with evidence
  • • Consensus: After enough participation, analysis reveals opinion groups and areas of agreement