翻訳中 — お使いの言語版を準備している間、このコンテンツは英語で表示されています。

ディスカッションに戻る

ディスカッションを保存

サインインして保存して更新を取得してください。

Site Linking to Abortion-Pill-Selling Websites Likely Protected by First Amendment, Even in States That Generally Ban Abortions

Politics

United States

July 18, 2026に開始

Mayday Health runs a website that provides various information about abortion pills. South Dakota law provides, in relevant part, No… The post Site Linking to Abortion-Pill-Selling Websites Likely Protected by First Amendment, Even in States That Generally Ban Abortions appeared first on Reason.com

ソース記事

Site Linking to Abortion-Pill-Selling Websites Likely Protected by First Amendment, Even in States That Generally Ban Abortions

Reason (United States) | Jul 17, 2026

主張を追加分析 0/5

並び替え：

Need to find a specific claim? Search all statements.

🗳️ Join the conversation

10 投票すべき主張 • Your perspective shapes the analysis

📊 Progress to Consensus Analysis Need: 7+ participants, 20+ votes, 3+ votes per statement

Participants 0/7

Statements (10+ recommended) 10/10

Total Votes 0/20

💡 Progress updates live here. Final readiness is confirmed when all three requirements are met.

Your votes count

No account needed — your votes are saved and included in the consensus analysis. Create an account to track your voting history and add statements.

CLAIM 投稿者： admin • Jul 18, 2026

Abortion pills should be available online regardless of state laws, as access to healthcare is a fundamental right.

翻訳準備中

💬 ディスカッションを見る

Be first to respond

Vote to see results

CLAIM 投稿者： admin • Jul 18, 2026

The First Amendment should not protect links to websites selling abortion pills in states with strict abortion laws.

翻訳準備中

💬 ディスカッションを見る

Be first to respond

Vote to see results

CLAIM 投稿者： admin • Jul 18, 2026

Courts must articulate clear rules about when speech directed at lawful out-of-state conduct can be restricted by states where that conduct is illegal.

翻訳準備中

💬 ディスカッションを見る

Be first to respond

Vote to see results

CLAIM 投稿者： admin • Jul 18, 2026

Linking to abortion-pill-selling websites undermines state efforts to regulate abortion access effectively.

翻訳準備中

💬 ディスカッションを見る

Be first to respond

Vote to see results

CLAIM 投稿者： admin • Jul 18, 2026

Information about legal medical options should be distinguishable from the act of providing those options for First Amendment purposes.

翻訳準備中

💬 ディスカッションを見る

Be first to respond

Vote to see results

CLAIM 投稿者： admin • Jul 18, 2026

States have the right to enforce laws that restrict access to abortion pills, regardless of website links.

翻訳準備中

💬 ディスカッションを見る

Be first to respond

Vote to see results

CLAIM 投稿者： admin • Jul 18, 2026

Individuals should have the right to information about abortion options, including online resources.

翻訳準備中

💬 ディスカッションを見る

Be first to respond

Vote to see results

CLAIM 投稿者： admin • Jul 18, 2026

The First Amendment should protect information and resources related to abortion, including links to pill-selling websites.

翻訳準備中

💬 ディスカッションを見る

Be first to respond

Vote to see results

CLAIM 投稿者： admin • Jul 18, 2026

States banning abortion should not impede access to information about abortion pills through online links.

翻訳準備中

💬 ディスカッションを見る

Be first to respond

Vote to see results

CLAIM 投稿者： admin • Jul 18, 2026

Courts should apply consistent free speech standards regardless of whether the speech concerns abortion, guns, or other politically contested topics.

翻訳準備中

💬 ディスカッションを見る

Be first to respond

Vote to see results

💡 How This Works

• Add Statements: Post claims or questions (10-500 characters)
• Vote: Agree, Disagree, or Unsure on each statement
• Respond: Add detailed pro/con responses with evidence
• Consensus: After enough participation, analysis reveals opinion groups and areas of agreement

Society Speaks is open and independent. Your support keeps civic discussion free from advertising and commercial influence.