Search Statements

Transitioning to reversible computing may require significant upfront investment that many companies cannot afford.

The list should track long-term impact of past honorees, publishing whether their recognised work actually changed their fields or the world.

The Innovators Under 35 list fails to adequately represent the global diversity of innovation outside the West.

The list should include innovators from non-Western countries at proportions matching global population and research output.

The Innovators Under 35 list should include more voices from marginalized communities to ensure a broader perspective on innovation.

The Innovators Under 35 list overlooks significant contributions from established experts in the field.

Recognising innovators under 35 is vital because radical breakthroughs often come from people without institutional inertia.

The focus on youth in the Innovators Under 35 list promotes ageism by undervaluing older innovators.

Innovations listed should be evaluated on potential societal benefit, not market size or venture capital interest.

The Innovators Under 35 list should openly name the selection criteria and judges, allowing public scrutiny of who gets recognised.

The criteria for selecting Innovators Under 35 should prioritize impact over age.

OpenAI's recent achievement exemplifies the need for clearer ethical guidelines regarding AI in academic fields.

AI's contribution to solving longstanding mathematical problems could diminish the value of human intuition in mathematics.

OpenAI's advancements in mathematics could inspire a new generation of mathematicians to embrace technology in their work.

The framing of OpenAI's mathematical achievements in the media affects public perception of AI's reliability.

The controversy surrounding OpenAI's mathematical milestone undermines trust in AI-generated solutions.

Collaboration between AI systems and human mathematicians could lead to innovative approaches to complex problems.

The mathematical community should be cautious about accepting AI-generated solutions without thorough validation.

AI solving complex mathematical problems could lead to breakthroughs that human mathematicians cannot achieve alone.

OpenAI's controversy reflects broader ethical concerns about AI's role in academia and research integrity.