Skip to main content
번역 진행 중 — 귀하의 언어 버전을 준비하는 동안 이 콘텐츠가 영어로 표시됩니다.
Back to Discussions

A more intelligent comment than most of the emotional reactions we are seeing

Politics
United States
Started January 26, 2026

What portion of Republicans think the Trump admin/ICE killing a few hundred people, roughing up a few thousand more, and violating all kinds of civil liberties is an acceptable price to pay for making net migration go deeply negative? The answer to that tells you when/how this ends. If it’s a small minority (unlikely), there’s […] The post A more intelligent comment than most of the emotional reactions we are seeing appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION. CommentsIn reply to Ai. Those are my t...

Source Articles

진술 추가 분석 0/5
Need to find a specific claim? Search all statements.
🗳️ Join the conversation
5 투표할 진술 • Your perspective shapes the analysis
📊 Progress to Consensus Analysis Need: 7+ participants, 20+ votes, 3+ votes per statement
Participants 0/7
Statements (7+ recommended) 5/7
Total Votes 0/20
💡 Progress updates live here. Final readiness is confirmed when all three requirements are met.

Your votes count

No account needed — your votes are saved and included in the consensus analysis. Create an account to track your voting history and add statements.

CLAIM 게시자: will • Jan 26, 2026
Understanding the majority Republican stance on immigration can reveal important insights into the future of U.S. policy and its ethical implications.

번역 대기 중

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 토론 보기
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM 게시자: will • Jan 26, 2026
The cost of human lives and civil rights violations cannot be justified by any immigration policy, regardless of its effectiveness.

번역 대기 중

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 토론 보기
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM 게시자: will • Jan 26, 2026
Accepting collateral damage in the pursuit of net negative migration undermines the foundational principles of democracy and justice.

번역 대기 중

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 토론 보기
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM 게시자: will • Jan 26, 2026
The potential for reduced illegal immigration justifies strict actions, even if they come at the cost of civil liberties.

번역 대기 중

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 토론 보기
Be first to respond
Vote to see results
CLAIM 게시자: will • Jan 26, 2026
Public opinion on immigration policy should focus on a balanced approach that considers both security and humanitarian values.

번역 대기 중

Vote options for this statement: agree, disagree, or unsure
💬 토론 보기
Be first to respond
Vote to see results

💡 How This Works

  • • Add Statements: Post claims or questions (10-500 characters)
  • • Vote: Agree, Disagree, or Unsure on each statement
  • • Respond: Add detailed pro/con responses with evidence
  • • Consensus: After enough participation, analysis reveals opinion groups and areas of agreement

Society Speaks is open and independent. Your support keeps civic discussion free from advertising and commercial influence.

Support us